-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3998-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEITH V. CUFF, a/k/a KEITH CUFF, and KEITH V. CUFF, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued June 3, 2025 – Decided June …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0494-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KENYON S. ESANNASON, a/k/a KENYON ESANNASON, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Submitted February 26, 2025 – Decided June 25, …
-
njcourts.gov
… various extracurricular activities.2 II. "When reviewing decisions granting or denying applications to modify child …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0085-21 GREEN FIELD CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARJAM SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued September 11, 2023 – Decided June 5, 2024 …
-
njcourts.gov
… the [WCA]." We disagree. We begin by noting we "review decisions granting summary judgment de novo," C.V. v. … v. Rova Farms, Inc., 56 N.J. 288, 305 (1970)). "[P]rior decisions have suggested that willful misconduct is the …
-
njcourts.gov
… New Jersey courts "give careful consideration to federal decisions interpreting the federal statute." Ates, 217 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1207-22 ESTATE OF FRANK P. LAGANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, Defendant-Respondent, and MICHAEL MORDAGA, Defendant. ________________________________ STATE OF NEW …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0850-23 A-0889-23 PARKE BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. VOORHEES DINER CORPORATION, MARK KLEIN and NICK DELLAPORTAS, Defendants, …
-
njcourts.gov
… A "SERIOUS THREAT." A. Mischaracterizations of the courts' decisions below. POINT II THE STATE MISREPRESENTED FACTS IN …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2011-22 B.B., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.R., III, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 6, 2024 – Decided February 5, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and …
-
njcourts.gov
… (outlining principles of appellate review of sentencing decisions). Defendant's lack of remorse was not the sole …
-
njcourts.gov
… authority, and appellate courts, in reviewing those decisions, must ensure that their decisions are faithful to the overall legislative framework …
-
njcourts.gov
… N.J. at 311. Our Supreme Court has held "[s]uch sensitive decisions will be subject to appellate modification only …
-
njcourts.gov
… under a deferential standard. A trial court's evidentiary decisions are generally not overturned unless they reflect …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1694-22 JOSEPH SILVESTRI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, Defendant-Respondent. Argued April 22, 2024 – Decided May 22, 2024 Before Judges Mawla and Marczyk. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
… there was no proof of imminent risk of harm; (2) Alice's decisions for Isaac's treatment and care were influenced by …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2678-23 R.M.C.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. W.K., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted May 13, 2025 – Decided May 28, 2025 Before Judges Firko and Augostini. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
… additional health care, or that you need to be discharged. Decisions about continuation of treatment should be made by …
-
njcourts.gov
… 311 (1978). Our Supreme Court has held, "Such sensitive decisions will be subject to appellate modification only …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0214-22 LUISA RODRIGUEZ, LUIS RODRIGUEZ, and BELKYS RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Submitted February 14, 2024 – Decided …