default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3515-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.S.1, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________ Submitted May 1, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sumners and …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-4873-15T1 A-2066-16T1 H.B., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. P.S., Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Argued telephonically November 5, 2018 – Decided January 9, 2019 Before Judges …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2049-14T2 ALFRED J. PETIT-CLAIR, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________________ Argued January 8, 2018 – Decided Before Judges …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4141-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANTHONY M. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued October 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1318-13T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TIANLE LI, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Argued January 23, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher, Fasciale and …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5031-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WILLIAM KING, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Argued January 24, 2019 – Decided May 8, 2019 Before Judges Fuentes, Vernoia …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-3275-17T4 A-3382-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GEORGE T. THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRIAN D. THOMPSON, a/k/a BOO THOMPSON, …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4685-16T1 SOMA LABS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MANAVKUMAR G. SHAH and VITACARE PHARMA, LLC, f/k/a VITACARE LABS, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, and PRIME PACK, LLC, d/b/a PRIME …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2295-16T5 A-4316-16T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF H.B., SVP-252-02. ____________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF B.L., SVP-463-07. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4207-15T1 AMANDA GAUGHRAN and MICHAEL GAUGHRAN, her husband, per quod, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF WARREN, WARREN COUNTY COUNCIL, RICH MACGUIRE, WASHINGTON CELEBRATES AMERICA COMMITTEE, …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3931-15T2 A-3933-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.A. and E.L., Sr., Defendants-Appellants. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2314-15T1 A-2709-15T11 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. P.S., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________________ IN THE …
default
… But to ensure none of the trial court 's sentencing decisions was influenced by an erroneous assumption that …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4962-18T2 ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ Argued November 12, 2020 – Decided Before Judges …
default
… dismissed and Angelo might have made different tactical decisions if he was participating as a defendant; and (3) …
default
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interests of …
default
… has now been made possible by recent constitutional decisions in State and Federal Courts.[10] The bill is [10] …
njcourts.gov
… 43 N.J. 148, 160 (1964)). "Generally, a trial court's decisions regarding voir dire are not to be disturbed on …
njcourts.gov
… year sentence is manifestly excessive. We review sentencing decisions for an abuse of discretion and will only reverse …
njcourts.gov
… omitted). We also undertake de novo review of trial court decisions concerning access to government records under the …