-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1810-18T4 MARYBETH JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW VIOLA, ESQUIRE, and ALBANO VIOLA, LLC, Defendants-Respondents. ___________________________ Argued February 3, 2020 – Decided Before …
-
njcourts.gov
… exclusiveness of the record,” thus, the court must base its decisions on the trial record, and not information …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2195-14T2 SITSOFE AWUKU, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. SUSAN SZAPIEL, MD, SHELLEY JONES-DILLON, MD, DR. ASHAR, MD, NKECHI ONYEKA, RN, ELITIOS RICHMOND, RN, CYNTHIA BENALES, RN, …
-
njcourts.gov
… him on the revised theory. Defendant's trial strategy decisions are not a basis for reversal. Furthermore, since …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4142-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GERY F. DESTRA, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted May 28, 2020 – Decided June 16, 2020 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
… underwear at Victoria Secret. Defendant argues that these decisions were highly prejudicial and constituted reversal error. The State argues that both of these decisions constituted a proper exercise of the judge's …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2501-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KANEM WILLIAMSON, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted October 3, 2019 – Decided January 9, 2020 Before Judges Alvarez and DeAlmeida. On appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2567-17T4 A-2843-17T4 A-4138-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHANE TIMMONS, a/k/a SHANE JAMILL TIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ STATE OF NEW JERSEY, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5334-16T1 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE (CWALT 2006-36T2), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARIANNE CORRADETTI and ANTHONY CORRADETTI, h/w, Defendants-Respondents, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4313-17T3 KC DYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY and THOMAS MCGRATH, Defendants-Respondents. __________________________ Argued telephonically March 24, 2020 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… was plaintiff's claim against Universal, and the jury's decisions as to the settling defendants 25 A-4530-14T2 were …
-
njcourts.gov
… its determination of them “to a case requiring those decisions.” Id. at 68-69. It affirmed the trial court’s …
-
njcourts.gov
… of this offense. Our conclusion is in accordance with decisions made by the majority of the courts that reviewed …
-
njcourts.gov
… it is the right of personal autonomy -- the right to make decisions without the compelled participation of an … a statute intended to supplant this Court’s palimony decisions. Last, he asks that the Court defer to the trial … N.J.S.A. 25:1- 24 5(h), was to “overturn recent ‘palimony’ decisions by New Jersey courts [such as Devaney and …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State …
-
njcourts.gov
… 146 N.J. Super. at 483. Instead, the court invoked pre-CNA decisions to reason that an initial tortfeasor “is … settings have been analyzed in few appellate decisions. Indeed, when Ciluffo was decided, neither this …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
-
njcourts.gov
… was seized by police from his home. Applying the test from decisions interpreting the federal Confrontation Clause, … to examine Crawford and the series of Supreme Court decisions that followed. Crawford and its progeny altered …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …