njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0853-16T4 A-0994-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … guardianship, which terminated their parental rights to the child. On appeal, Tracey contends the trial judge erred in … Servs. v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591 (1986), and is more than amply supported by the record. F.M., supra, 211 N.J. at 448- 49. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0853-16T4 A-0994-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … guardianship, which terminated their parental rights to the child. On appeal, Tracey contends the trial judge erred in … Servs. v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591 (1986), and is more than amply supported by the record. F.M., supra, 211 N.J. at 448- 49. …
njcourts.gov
… the court misapplied the standard for modification or termination of alimony under Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139 … no dispute that throughout the marriage plaintiff was the supporting spouse and defendant was a full-time homemaker and primary caretaker to the parties' three children. 3 A-2599-23 The MSA required plaintiff to pay …
-
njcourts.gov
… the court misapplied the standard for modification or termination of alimony under Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139 … no dispute that throughout the marriage plaintiff was the supporting spouse and defendant was a full-time homemaker and primary caretaker to the parties' three children. 3 A-2599-23 The MSA required plaintiff to pay …
njcourts.gov
… December 8, 2011, after sixteen years of marriage and one child. Their property settlement and support agreement (PSA) was incorporated into their final … on the 2011 PSA—that it expressly provided for termination upon remarriage, and also based on N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… December 8, 2011, after sixteen years of marriage and one child. Their property settlement and support agreement (PSA) was incorporated into their final … on the 2011 PSA—that it expressly provided for termination upon remarriage, and also based on N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
… from a Family Part order denying her motion to impose child support on plaintiff Jeffrey Slosky. Defendant argues the … only addresses the court's child support 7 A-2032-22 determination. See Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. Court …
-
njcourts.gov
… from a Family Part order denying her motion to impose child support on plaintiff Jeffrey Slosky. Defendant argues the … only addresses the court's child support 7 A-2032-22 determination. See Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. Court …
njcourts.gov
… was the Corporate Secretary and Accounting Manager. A third child, Anne Covey (Anne), and her husband served as outside … that such conduct would result in disciplinary action up to termination. By the spring of 2002, as thoroughly detailed … leave them undisturbed if there is substantial evidence to support them. Seidman v. Clifton Sav. Bank, 205 N.J. 150, …
-
njcourts.gov
… was the Corporate Secretary and Accounting Manager. A third child, Anne Covey (Anne), and her husband served as outside … that such conduct would result in disciplinary action up to termination. By the spring of 2002, as thoroughly detailed … leave them undisturbed if there is substantial evidence to support them. Seidman v. Clifton Sav. Bank, 205 N.J. 150, …
default
… Eric S. Solotoff argued the cause for appellant (Fox Rothschild LLP, attorneys; Eric S. Solotoff, of counsel and on … custody, and the mother filed a cross-motion for child support. During the litigation, the mother accused the … recalculating the child support award in light of that determination. Addressing the mother's first two points, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… Eric S. Solotoff argued the cause for appellant (Fox Rothschild LLP, attorneys; Eric S. Solotoff, of counsel and on … custody, and the mother filed a cross-motion for child support. During the litigation, the mother accused the … recalculating the child support award in light of that determination. Addressing the mother's first two points, we …
default
… 1:36-3. 2 A-3885-17T3 Plaintiff Tracy Eskridge-Joseph is a child support hearing officer (CS Hearing Officer) employed by the … further advised plaintiff that the AOC was seeking her termination based on those charges. The AOC also suspended …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1:36-3. 2 A-3885-17T3 Plaintiff Tracy Eskridge-Joseph is a child support hearing officer (CS Hearing Officer) employed by the … further advised plaintiff that the AOC was seeking her termination based on those charges. The AOC also suspended …
-
A-2611-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Pursuant to R. 2:6-2(b), please accept this letter brief in support of my appeal in this matter. Superior Court of New … A5 THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO SET APPROPRIATE CHILD SUPPORT AMOUNTS FROM 2017 THROUGH 2022. Raised below … A5 THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO SET APPROPRIATE CHILD SUPPORT AMOUNTS FROM 21117 THROUGH 2022. Raised below …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1139-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. … to cite with particularity any new or modified finding supported by competent 13 A-1139-15T4 and credible evidence … unreasonable or capricious action, the agency's determination must be affirmed." C.H., supra, 414 N.J. Super. …
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiff and defendant were married on March 25, 2011. Two children were born from the marriage. The record shows a … as the parties litigated custody, parenting time, and child support issues. For brevity's sake, we focus on the court … ordering: plaintiff to have sole custody of the children; termination of defendant's parenting time; defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiff and defendant were married on March 25, 2011. Two children were born from the marriage. The record shows a … as the parties litigated custody, parenting time, and child support issues. For brevity's sake, we focus on the court … ordering: plaintiff to have sole custody of the children; termination of defendant's parenting time; defendant's …
njcourts.gov
… was indicted for second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(b)(5)(a), fourth-degree endangering … logic . . . . While the ALJ did not dispute the Board's determination that Clarke's misconduct had a high degree of … decision is "arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or not supported by substantial credible evidence in the record as …
-
njcourts.gov
… was indicted for second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(b)(5)(a), fourth-degree endangering … logic . . . . While the ALJ did not dispute the Board's determination that Clarke's misconduct had a high degree of … decision is "arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or not supported by substantial credible evidence in the record as …