njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 23, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … offenses and possession of a radio to intercept emergency communications while committing or attempting to commit a … is . . . the single most important factor in the sentencing process." State v. Hodge, 95 N.J. 369, 378-79 (1984). Here, …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 10, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher, Ostrer and Leone. On appeal from the … consider a certification containing hearsay statements by company officers discussing an explicitly discriminatory … identified executives "directly involved in the hiring process" because "the statements concerned an issue within …
default
… Submitted March 16, 2022 – Decided June 22, 2022 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … back." Skordos "advised [the 3 A-2338-19 officers] she was coming back with the car." The officers waited with Skordos … speculation without support" and "infect[ed] the sentencing process." We disagree. Appellate courts review sentencing …
default
… Submitted March 3, 2022 – Decided May 17, 2022 Before Judges Haas, Mawla and Alvarez. On appeal from the … participation would have 6 A-0525-20 affected the outcome. In fact, defendant did not even identify sidebars of particular importance to the trial process. He considered defendant's alleged prejudice from …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 12, 2021 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Moynihan. On appeal before the … and others similarly situated, plaintiff Tracey M. Perez commenced an action against defendant, seeking damages based … from a default judgment before arguing some defect in the process that led to its entry or the content of the judgment …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 19, 2021 - Decided April 1, 2021 Before Judges Messano, Hoffman and Smith. On appeal from the … 105 (the PBA) appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their complaint pursuant to R. 4:6-2(e). For the reasons stated … that discretion, a court must go through "a two-step process: whether the non-moving party will be prejudiced, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 13, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Moynihan and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … to help them resolve future disputes and to provide recommendations on parenting. In September 2017, the parenting … consequence[] . . . [that] arose through" the judicial process. This appeal ensued, with defendant filing a …
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 24, 2020 – Decided May 8, 2020 Before Judges Sabatino, Sumners and Geiger. On appeal from the … summary judgment dismissal of the transgender plaintiff's complaint under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, … [c]ourt order the [JCPD] to commission changes to its data processing that would allow the correct affirmed gender of …
njcourts.gov
… telephonically June 1, 2020 – Decided July 17, 2020 Before Judges Moynihan and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … from the trial court's orders denying her motion, and concomitant motion to reconsider that denial, including her … legal and factual positions and the results of the entire process in each of the motions. The court did not abuse its …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 10, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … one of Indictment No. 12-03-0628. The State agreed to recommend that the court sentence defendant to nineteen years … more time to prepare for trial. Defendant argues his due process rights were thereby violated, and he was "forced" to …
default
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 105 (the PBA) appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their complaint pursuant to R. 4:6-2(e). For the reasons stated … that discretion, a court must go through "a two-step process: whether the non-moving party will be prejudiced, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 10, 2025 – Decided October 15, 2025 Before Judges Paganelli and Jacobs. On appeal from the … in exchange for defendant's plea to count one, agreed to recommend a three-year prison term with one year to be served … imminent death within six months due to an active disease process." 273 N.J. Super. 262, 265 (App. Div. 1994). We were …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 16, 2022 – Decided June 22, 2022 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … back." Skordos "advised [the 3 A-2338-19 officers] she was coming back with the car." The officers waited with Skordos … speculation without support" and "infect[ed] the sentencing process." We disagree. Appellate courts review sentencing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 3, 2022 – Decided May 17, 2022 Before Judges Haas, Mawla and Alvarez. On appeal from the … participation would have 6 A-0525-20 affected the outcome. In fact, defendant did not even identify sidebars of particular importance to the trial process. He considered defendant's alleged prejudice from …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 105 (the PBA) appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their complaint pursuant to R. 4:6-2(e). For the reasons stated … that discretion, a court must go through "a two-step process: whether the non-moving party will be prejudiced, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 5, 2019 – Decided July 16, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … officer's conduct. The motion court found that eight of the complaints involved suspects charged with conduct similar to … factual issues and numerous motions also created a lengthy process. 15 A-1513-17T1 Defendant moved for dismissal …
-
njcourts.gov
… NJ 07601 Tel: (609)815-2922 ex. 54570 Fax: (201)996-802 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS February 1, 2019 Joseph G. Buro, Esq. … not respond to this proposal until 2018. The negotiation process eventually fell apart, and so 99 Murray Hill decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 13, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Moynihan and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … to help them resolve future disputes and to provide recommendations on parenting. In September 2017, the parenting … consequence[] . . . [that] arose through" the judicial process. This appeal ensued, with defendant filing a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 24, 2020 – Decided May 8, 2020 Before Judges Sabatino, Sumners and Geiger. On appeal from the … summary judgment dismissal of the transgender plaintiff's complaint under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, … [c]ourt order the [JCPD] to commission changes to its data processing that would allow the correct affirmed gender of …
-
njcourts.gov
… MONMOUTH COUNTY and CHERYL DYER, Superintendent of Schools for the Wall Township School District, NOT FOR PUBLICATION … Before Judges Sumners and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Commissioner of Education, Docket No. 252-10/17. Flavio L. … bring increased openness and transparency to the budgeting process for schools and municipalities. All municipal …