-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 13, 2025 – Decided May 28, 2025 Before Judges Firko and Augostini. On appeal from the Superior … domestic violence. Plaintiff alleged the parties' went to a comedy show called "Couples Therapy" in March 2023 in … gaslighting" that she was terrified. In her amended complaint, plaintiff also alleged that on March 17, 2023, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 3, 2025 – Decided April 21, 2025 Before Judges Natali, Walcott-Henderson, and Vinci. On appeal … an immediate left turn from Bond Street onto 5 A-3183-22 Community Lane and almost collided with a vehicle heading … plea agreement. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration. 12 A-3183-22 POINT I THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 14, 2024 – Decided April 15, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … 8, 2022 oral decision. On June 30, 2020, plaintiffs filed a complaint against Enrique1 seeking partition of the Property … with their respective interests or , in the alternative, compelling the sale of the Property and the division of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 30, 2022 – Decided January 10, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … by 3SI Security Systems (3SI), the device consisted of components that connect to satellites and cellular towers, … its location as it traveled toward Piscataway, ultimately coming to a stop near 329 Barbour Place. 3SI communicated …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 25, 2023 – Decided May 26, 2023 Before Judges Sumners, Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from an … before a different judge because the trial judge did not comply with our sentencing guidelines. State v. Eisemann, … the amount of $200,000 was issued in mid-March to GZYD, a company owned by Jonathan Rubin, which made loans to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 6, 2023 – Decided June 20, 2023 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … closing arguments. On May 23, 2022, the judge issued a comprehensive written statement of reasons amplifying her … TERPO. This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: I. THE ENTRY OF A [FERPO] BY …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 21, 2023 – Decided April 3, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Geiger. On appeal from the Superior … for the reasons expressed by Judge Sara Beth Johnson in her comprehensive letter opinion. Defendant was charged with … This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: I. THIS MATTER MUST BE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 28, 2023 – Decided April 4, 2023 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … per hour, and as he approached a curve, a warning sign recommended a speed of 35 miles per hour. The road surface was … by the State followed.2 II. The State raises the following points for our consideration: I. THE TRIAL COURT'S SENTENCE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 31, 2022 – Decided April 5, 2023 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … winds. Two days later on April 29, plaintiffs lodged a complaint with the Township by email repeating the concerns … photographs of the fence installation documenting their complaints. They noted they were "anxiously awaiting a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 15, 2022 – Decided April 10, 2023 Before Judges Susswein and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the … the FJOD was entered. Despite the parties owning various commercial properties, and agreeing to divide substantial … four pages long and contains only estimated values for the commercial properties at issue. Material to the within …
-
njcourts.gov
… USA, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PAULSBORO REFINING COMPANY, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ … Argued November 9, 2021 – Decided September 23, 2022 Before Judges Currier, DeAlmeida, and Smith. On appeal from … delivered by DeALMEIDA, J.A.D. Defendant Paulsboro Refining Company, LLC (PRC) appeals from the June 16, 2020 order of …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … plaintiffs Christopher Maia and Sean Howarth filed a complaint alleging defendant IEW Construction Group had … November 2021, and Howarth asserted he had worked for the company from April 2020 to November 2021. Plaintiffs' …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 22, 2023 – Decided August 23, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … seeking to pay all outstanding rent and dismiss plaintiff's complaint and the consent judgment based on the newly … have the money and the tenant is going to be locked out and comes up with the money later." On this point, plaintiff …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 18, 2023 – Decided November 30, 2023 Before Judges Natali and Puglisi. On appeal from the Board of … extremities, as well as the neck and the head. It is also accompanied by chronic fatigue, insomnia, which is … facet disease of the cervical spine," and "tender points in the cervical spine and upper back and diminished …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 12, 2023 – Decided October 3, 2023 Before Judges Rose and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … assault, N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2(b), and his sentence included community supervision for life (CSL). In April 2002, … defendant to pay fines only. Defendant argues the following points on appeal: POINT I BECAUSE THE STATE FAILED TO …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 18, 2023 – Decided July 28, 2023 Before Judges Messano and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … client out." Trial counsel further stated: "I want it to come in. I want it to be shown that she looked and didn't … Defendant challenged his convictions, raising several points for the first time on appeal. He also claimed his …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 11, 2023 – Decided February 13, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … under the FRO. The trial court's findings that defendant committed assault and harassment are supported by … findings that defendant's harassment included disparaging comments about plaintiff's girlfriend, and there was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 6, 2024 – Decided March 15, 2024 Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … will, for reasons not explained, neither party included a complete copy in the record. We rely upon the recitation of … children about animal cruelty, advertising in local newspapers, and participating in the New Jersey Animal Show. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 26, 2023 — Decided October 25, 2023 Before Judges Marczyk and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … 2022 order dismissing with prejudice a seven-count amended complaint, claiming that the court's order and accompanying statement of reasons failed to comply with Rule …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 6, 2025 – Decided July 7, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … at the time the crimes of which he was convicted were committed. In particular, he faults trial counsel for … and his co-defendant with first-degree conspiracy to commit murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and 2C:11-3(a)(1) and (2); …