njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2329-19 A-3679-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.R. and … and suffers from other mental health issues. Her compliance with Division-referred services during the course … events subsequent to his evaluation. Under prong four, the ultimate question is "whether, after considering and …
njcourts.gov
… Counsel, on the brief). NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … the expiration of that agreement, the County and PBA 299 commenced negotiations for a new CBA for the period between … agreement does not exist. 9 A-2418-19 The arbitrator ultimately sustained PBA 299's grievance. The arbitrator …
njcourts.gov
… and on the briefs). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Nancy A. Hulett, … away. Later that day, defendant was served with an amended complaint at the MCDC adding the charge of first-degree … rights and his potential sentencing exposure. Ultimately, the court accepted defendant's guilty plea, …
default
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW … request. Heintz located the vehicle and observed its driver commit two motor vehicle violations. Heintz stopped the car … Ibid. He then returned to the car to continue the search, ultimately finding a significant amount of cocaine. Ibid. We …
njcourts.gov
… argued the cause for appellant. Ali Y. Ozbek, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Camelia M. … and (2) (count two); failure to pay New Jersey state income tax, N.J.S.A. 54:52-9 (count three); and filing a false … examining the cell phone was irrelevant to the theft case. Ultimately, the prosecutor and defense counsel stipulated as …
njcourts.gov
… M. Personette, on the brief). Ian C. Kennedy, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mark Musella, … two Ferraris to a function at the Meadowlands Sports Complex when defendant's red Ferrari crossed the … 33 (quoting State v. Hicks, 54 N.J. 390, 391 (1969)). The ultimate determination "is whether the disparity is …
njcourts.gov
… DATED DECEMBER 8, 2008 with a 50% interest, as tenants in common, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. JULIAN ANTEBI and HILARY … TREE FARM LANDSCAPING, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … conducted a site inspection of the parties' properties. Ultimately, the court issued a March 29, 2016 order (the No …
njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-4516-18T1 A-4517-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.P. and … 20, 2017, the Division received a referral that Zebulon complained of D.P. "whooping him." The child had bruises on … that D.P. "neglected to protect [her] child[ren]." Ultimately, the judge found, by a preponderance of the …
njcourts.gov
… counsel and on the brief). Angelo J. Onofri, Mercer County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Laura C. Sunyak, … truthfully at defendant's trial in exchange for the State recommending a probationary sentence. In a statement recorded … the shooting, defendant could not and did not carry his "ultimate burden . . . to prove a very substantial likelihood …
njcourts.gov
… HAVEN and VICTORIA ROSE NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … LLC's ("Victoria") motion to dismiss their verified complaint in lieu of prerogative writ. We affirm in part and … plan was consistent with the redevelopment ordinance and ultimately properly approved by the Board." This appeal …
default
… the briefs). PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … defendant Andrew J. Plura was found guilty of failing to comply with court-imposed restrictions on his internet … Prior to the VOP hearing, the court denied defendant's ultimate motion to dismiss the first charge for spoliation …
njcourts.gov
… Counsel, on the brief). Marc A. Festa, Senior Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Camelia M. … Evidence of an Unlawful Purpose. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN DENYING THE MOTION FOR A … clarify what you could extrapolate from the evidence. But, ultimately, it's for you to decide whether [defendant] …
njcourts.gov
… Docket No. L-2623-15. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … the September 18, 2018 order that dismissed its amended complaint with prejudice following a jury trial, arguing the … services to other 9 A-1037-18T4 advisors, who would ultimately have the opportunity to utilize [his] expertise …
njcourts.gov
… on the brief). PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … counsel fees to both parties. We affirm. Defendant is a commercial tenant operating a skilled nursing facility in … to depart from the appraisal guidelines or prejudice [his] ultimate determination of the AFMRV." He pointed out that …
njcourts.gov
… Counsel, on the brief). Esther Suarez, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Erin M. Campbell, … (2) (count one); one count of first-degree felony murder – commission of crime, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a)(3) (count two); two … a reasonable likelihood that his or her claim will ultimately succeed on the merits." State v. Marshall, 148 …
njcourts.gov
… and NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … of counsel; Russell J. Malta, on the brief). PER CURIAM Complaining about defendants' treatment of him after he had … the primary question of accrual and directly confront the ultimate question of extraordinary circumstances. What is …
njcourts.gov
… attorney for appellant. Mark Musella, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (William P. Miller, … not to do so. A jury convicted defendant L.O.R.1 of having committed one count of first-degree aggravated sexual … diminution [of cross-examination] calls into question the ultimate integrity of the fact-finding process." Id. at 532. …
njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-5048-17T4 A-5049-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.M. and … harm than good. Such a determination requires an expedited comparative bonding evaluation and subsequent hearing. 4 … Servs. v. R.L., 388 N.J. Super. 81, 89 (App. Div. 2006). Ultimately, a family court's decision should not be …
njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-0392-18T1 A-0393-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M.J and … the same time. In early November 2015, the Division filed a complaint for care and supervision of the children due to … by her father. Wade denied the allegation, and the Division ultimately concluded the allegation of sexual abuse was not …
default
… MEADOWLANDS HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BESLER & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant. … on the brief). PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not … show that it did not contribute to delaying the dispute's ultimate resolution and therefore, as a matter of equity, …