-
njcourts.gov
… Carter, supra, 191 N.J. at 482-83).] Deference to agency decisions applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions. …
-
njcourts.gov
… matter of law. Our role in reviewing administrative agency decisions is limited. In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). We affirm such decisions where they are supported by the evidence, even if …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1572-16T3 LORENZO RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. VIDYA GANGADIN, BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESIDENT and RAMON RIVERA, BOARD ATTORNEY, Respondents, and THE JERSEY CITY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, RONALD F. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1020-20 JOSE VARGAS, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted September 19, 2022 – Decided September 30, 2022 Before Judges Mawla and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Ret. Sys., 206 N.J. 14, 27 (2011)). We "review[] agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." …
-
njcourts.gov
… challenges. This appeal followed. Our review of final decisions of the Board is limited. Malacow v. N.J. Dep't of … Corr., 457 N.J. Super. 87, 93 (App. Div. 2018). The Board's decisions, like those of other administrative agencies, will …
-
njcourts.gov
… law. Ibid. "Wide discretion is afforded to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4645-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.D.Z., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted September 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges …
default
… 73, 150 N.J. 331, 352 (1997) (citations omitted). PERC decisions will not be disturbed unless the decision "is …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2239-18T4 MICHAEL J. MONAGHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK PLANNING BOARD, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Submitted April 20, 2020 – Decided May 8, 2020 Before …
default
… of the LGEL, but the Court there directed that "[f]uture decisions should be consistent with the principles of [the … Wyzykowski's analytical paradigm continues to influence our decisions. See, e.g., Grabowsky, 221 N.J. A-4482-16T4 9 at … only the potential for conflict is necessary. Id. at 524. Decisions construing A-4482-16T4 12 N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.5(d) …
njcourts.gov
… provides ample explanation for defense counsel's strategic decisions. Reviewing the record in light of the governing … "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional … "must overcome the presumption that the attorney's decisions followed a sound strategic approach to the case." …
-
njcourts.gov
… 73, 150 N.J. 331, 352 (1997) (citations omitted). PERC decisions will not be disturbed unless the decision "is …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4645-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.D.Z., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted September 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2239-18T4 MICHAEL J. MONAGHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK PLANNING BOARD, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Submitted April 20, 2020 – Decided May 8, 2020 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
… of the LGEL, but the Court there directed that "[f]uture decisions should be consistent with the principles of [the … Wyzykowski's analytical paradigm continues to influence our decisions. See, e.g., Grabowsky, 221 N.J. A-4482-16T4 9 at … only the potential for conflict is necessary. Id. at 524. Decisions construing A-4482-16T4 12 N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.5(d) …
-
njcourts.gov
… provides ample explanation for defense counsel's strategic decisions. Reviewing the record in light of the governing … "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional … "must overcome the presumption that the attorney's decisions followed a sound strategic approach to the case." …
-
A-74-75-76-24 - Amicus Curiae Brief Attorney General NJDOBI and OIFP Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… consider evidence of fraud as a defense when making their decisions, they cannot grant affirmative relief to insurance … February 25, 2025 Page 8 resolution, and the trial court’s decisions were reversed. (DPa14). The Appellate Division … below is in conflict with other appellate or Supreme Court decisions, or if the interest of justice so requires. R. …
njcourts.gov
… sheet" noting its unanimous vote to affirm the panels' decisions to withhold disclosure of the 2018 Segal … really say about it." Parole Board panels document their decisions using a checklist of "mitigating factors" and … capabilities." 18 A-0072-19 W.M. appealed the panels' decisions to the full Board, relying on a six- page brief …
default
… the December 8, 2015 and April 4, 2016 interlocutory decisions as the final order was entered against APDI and … of the regulations as determined by the interlocutory decisions. Further, at the April 4, 2016 reconsideration … merits of the court's December 8, 2015 and April 4, 2016 decisions, despite the absence of a formal order. Second, we …