-
2C:21-25c
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… believe to be derived from criminal activity. In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the … other power, financial instruments, information, data and computer software, in either human readable or computer … operative act.12 Fair market value is the price that a buyer would be willing to pay and a seller would be willing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 4, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … stolen credit card numbers and use the information to buy and then sell merchandise. Another member of the … four other counts of the indictment and promised to recommend a sentence of not more than six years in prison with …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 18, 2018 – Decided July 5, 2018 Before Judges Fisher and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior … contingency clause in a real estate contract and whether buyers, who obtained a mortgage commitment but failed to meet all the lender's NOT FOR …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 17, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … B. Trainer pled guilty to second-degree conspiracy to commit robbery, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2(a) and N.J.S.A. … that he was the driver of the Hyundai, a vehicle he was buying from a friend. He also stated that he could not …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued telephonically May 6, 2020 – Decided May 26, 2020 Before Judges Fisher and Gilson. On appeal from the Superior … Watson and Joy Piddington formed two limited liability companies: Antiques Only, LLC, to facilitate their business … estate 3 A-0423-19T3 seeks, among other things, to compel a buy-out and an accounting, as well as damages. Piddington …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Plaintiff Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (SEA), filed a complaint against defendant Westpark Electronics, LLC, d/b/a … information "confidential." Defendant claims it is not buying televisions from SEA's authorized dealers. Plaintiff …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 27, 2017 - Decided Before Judges Accurso and O'Connor. On appeal from the Board … the police department by a citizen as part of a Gun Amnesty Buy Back Program. He was apprehended in a sting operation … benefits. The law is clear that decisions by the Board become final unless a request for a hearing is filed within …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 9, 2021 – Decided February 26, 2021 Before Judges Fisher and Gilson. On appeal from the Superior … had a minority shareholder but advised he would imminently buy out that shareholder. More than two months went by … leave but would sign the document understanding it would be completed in his absence. The next day, defendant discharged …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 8, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges Natali and Jablonski. On appeal from the … Respondent has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In this commercial tenancy action, plaintiff Remaq Corporation … N.J. 286, 303 4 A-0527-24 (2024) (quoting Kieffer v. Best Buy, 205 N.J. 213, 223 (2011)). We also review a trial …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 17, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Farrington. On appeal from the … leaving A.K.B. for long periods of time and her lack of compliance with the requirements of public assistance, … skills classes. In 2014, Petra was referred three times to Visiting Homemaker Service for parenting skills training and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 17, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Farrington. On appeal from the … leaving A.K.B. for long periods of time and her lack of compliance with the requirements of public assistance, … skills classes. In 2014, Petra was referred three times to Visiting Homemaker Service for parenting skills training and …
default
… Submitted March 26, 2019 – Decided May 10, 2019 Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … were baptized, and received their First Penance and First Communion. When the motion judge issued the orders now under … children to other cultural practices during that parent's visitation time. Feldman, 378 N.J. Super. at 96. In fact, we …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner, Hoffman and Mayer. On appeal from … order). In December 2015, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in Essex County, where defendant resides with … established a joint residence; instead, they alternated visiting plaintiff's residence, first in Maryland and then …
default
… Argued October 14, 2021 – Decided April 25, 2022 Before Judges Currier and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … but in August of that year went back to New Jersey to visit plaintiffs. They then absconded with the child, … defendants' motion and filed a cross-motion, seeking to compel defendants to pay for therapy themselves. In the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 3, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … plaintiff's application without prejudice pending the outcome of litigation filed by the Division of Child Protection … Permanency (DCPP), which restricted defendant ex-husband's visitation with the children. Because we conclude the judge …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 14, 2021 – Decided April 25, 2022 Before Judges Currier and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … but in August of that year went back to New Jersey to visit plaintiffs. They then absconded with the child, … defendants' motion and filed a cross-motion, seeking to compel defendants to pay for therapy themselves. In the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 26, 2019 – Decided May 10, 2019 Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … were baptized, and received their First Penance and First Communion. When the motion judge issued the orders now under … children to other cultural practices during that parent's visitation time. Feldman, 378 N.J. Super. at 96. In fact, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 3, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … plaintiff's application without prejudice pending the outcome of litigation filed by the Division of Child Protection … Permanency (DCPP), which restricted defendant ex-husband's visitation with the children. Because we conclude the judge …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner, Hoffman and Mayer. On appeal from … order). In December 2015, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in Essex County, where defendant resides with … established a joint residence; instead, they alternated visiting plaintiff's residence, first in Maryland and then …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the comprehensive sixty-four-page written opinion issued by the … found, the Division transported Sally to Pennsylvania to visit with Peter, explored potential placement with him, and …