-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0911-24 KEITH LOFTUS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TERESA LOFTUS, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted November 19, 2025 – Decided March 2, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Jacobs. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3983-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHNNY SANTIAGO, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Argued February 25, 2026 – Decided March 10, 2026 Before Judges Gummer and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0250-24 J&R PARAISO LLC, JOSE H. HERNANDEZ, and JORGE GUZMAN ARGUETA, Plaintiffs-Respondents/ Cross-Appellants, v. ERICK GARCIA, individually, and as Corporate Agent for 44 WATCHUNG AVE, LLC, …
njcourts.gov
## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in …
njcourts.gov
## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3081-24 MICHAEL MCMAHON and KRISTIN KIEFER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KARCHIK HOMES, KARCHIK HOMES, LLC, KARCHIK HOMES, LLC CONSTRUCTION, INC., and RONALD A. KARCHIK, a/k/a RONALD KARCHIK, …
njcourts.gov
… alleged conduct could constitute adverse employment decisions. However, the judge focused his analysis of …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
… by taxpayer, as contemplated by the Browning-Ferris decisions. Moreover, only United was obligated to pay …
njcourts.gov
* NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Mala Sundar R.J. Hughes Justice Complex JUDGE P.O. Box 975 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Telephone (609) 815-2922 TeleFax: (609) 376-3018 …
njcourts.gov
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0316-09T2 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, …
njcourts.gov
… N.J. Super. 597, 617 (App. Div. 2009) (quoting Stochastic Decisions, Inc. v. DiDomenico, 236 N.J. Super. 388, 395 …
njcourts.gov
… and final disposition through the avoidance of ‘piecemeal decisions.’” Kent, 207 N.J. at 443 (citing Cogdell v. Hosp. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0980-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. T.M.F.,1 Defendant-Appellant, and A.H.G., Defendant, ___________________________ IN THE …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1505-21 JANA M. WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEPH F. FARINELLA and NICOLE FARINELLA, Defendants-Respondents. __________________________ Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided May 3, 2024 …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1936-21 J.R., as administratrix ad prosequendum of the Estate of V.R. and J.R.,1 individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW …
njcourts.gov
… needs minor were made public, then the investigative decisions "might be postponed or referred to the Division of …
njcourts.gov
… the easement through the 200-foot area. The trial court's decisions did not address such a possibility. The court also …