njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0843-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … large part by spending extended unsupervised time with the children in October 2016, contrary to a provision of a March … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support" the family court's decision. Id. at 448-49. Through …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0843-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … large part by spending extended unsupervised time with the children in October 2016, contrary to a provision of a March … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support" the family court's decision. Id. at 448-49. Through …
default
… Gubler were married for twenty-three years and had three children who were ages twenty, eighteen, and fifteen at the … years at $100,000 per year. There was no direct child support payments for the parties' youngest child but the … if a "[t]erminating [e]vent" occurred, which included "termination of [plaintiff's] [s]ervice [r]elationship with …
-
njcourts.gov
… Gubler were married for twenty-three years and had three children who were ages twenty, eighteen, and fifteen at the … years at $100,000 per year. There was no direct child support payments for the parties' youngest child but the … if a "[t]erminating [e]vent" occurred, which included "termination of [plaintiff's] [s]ervice [r]elationship with …
default
… the PSA; (3) compel reunification therapy with the parties' children; (4) reduce child support; (5) compel plaintiff to produce an updated case … also be considered. Id. at 122. Because child support determinations in this context are fact-sensitive, "courts …
-
njcourts.gov
… the PSA; (3) compel reunification therapy with the parties' children; (4) reduce child support; (5) compel plaintiff to produce an updated case … also be considered. Id. at 122. Because child support determinations in this context are fact-sensitive, "courts …
-
A-0534-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Correspondence from Molly Logan, of the Parole Board Legal Support Unit to Thomas McQuillan, Esq, Acknowledging receipt … of this appeal, the State Parole Board claims that “The determination of the VOA to discharge Mr. Kelly from the … with Jimena Johnson, who was pregnant with Mr. Kelly’s child. (1T 13-21 to 14-2) Mr. Kelly pled guilty with an …
default
… disabled as a result of something that occurred during childbirth and has been receiving social security disability … obligation of $125 effective December 1, 2015, and a weekly child support obligation of $136 effective June 1, 2015, which …
-
njcourts.gov
… disabled as a result of something that occurred during childbirth and has been receiving social security disability … obligation of $125 effective December 1, 2015, and a weekly child support obligation of $136 effective June 1, 2015, which …
njcourts.gov
… December 26, 2017 2 A-4261-15T4 arrangements for her two children, who presently reside with their father, defendant … her children, that the psychiatric exam ordered by this determination is both necessary and proper. The court places … strong weight on [the teacher's] testimony," and found it supported the conclusions of Doctors Racite, Udell, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… December 26, 2017 2 A-4261-15T4 arrangements for her two children, who presently reside with their father, defendant … her children, that the psychiatric exam ordered by this determination is both necessary and proper. The court places … strong weight on [the teacher's] testimony," and found it supported the conclusions of Doctors Racite, Udell, and …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5577-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there was sufficient credible evidence in the record supporting the judge's decision, we affirm. At a two-day … Our standard of review of the Family Part's fact-finding determination is limited. N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5577-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there was sufficient credible evidence in the record supporting the judge's decision, we affirm. At a two-day … Our standard of review of the Family Part's fact-finding determination is limited. N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1329-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to provide any medical evidence or testimony to support her claims, and declined to identify her treating … standards, we discern no basis for disturbing the judge's determination that Evan should be placed in Charles's care and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1329-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to provide any medical evidence or testimony to support her claims, and declined to identify her treating … standards, we discern no basis for disturbing the judge's determination that Evan should be placed in Charles's care and …
njcourts.gov
… time for C.N. and defendant M.F. with respect to their child. We affirm. I. The following facts are derived from … year relationship during which they produced a child. After termination of the relationship, the parties agreed … legal principles or made findings inconsistent with or unsupported by competent evidence." Storey v. Storey, 373 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… time for C.N. and defendant M.F. with respect to their child. We affirm. I. The following facts are derived from … year relationship during which they produced a child. After termination of the relationship, the parties agreed … legal principles or made findings inconsistent with or unsupported by competent evidence." Storey v. Storey, 373 N.J. …
njcourts.gov
… of the jurisdictional “household member” requirement, a child whose parents are separated during youth but who … floor – not a ceiling – to post-amendment jurisdictional determinations. D. Insurance Policy Interpretation “Household” … New Jersey Family Law Child Custody, Protection & Support § 21:2-1(b) (2018) (collecting authorities). In such …
njcourts.gov
… and defendant were married on June 21, 1987, and had one child. The couple divorced March 8, 2011, entering into a property settlement and support agreement (the agreement). The agreement obligates … Plaintiff asserts the record does not support the judge's determination and factual findings because the judge took no …
-
njcourts.gov
… and defendant were married on June 21, 1987, and had one child. The couple divorced March 8, 2011, entering into a property settlement and support agreement (the agreement). The agreement obligates … Plaintiff asserts the record does not support the judge's determination and factual findings because the judge took no …