-
njcourts.gov
… Hunter Shkolnik, Esq. Keefe Bartels 170 Monmouth Street Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 John E. Keefe, Esq. Joshua Kincannon, … Esq. Cohen Placitella & Roth, P.C. 127 Maple Avenue Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 Christopher M. Placitella, Esq. … David Lustbader Allegra Law Office 286 Broad Street Red Bank NJ 077012003 Peter Allegra Eichen Crutchlow & Mcelroy …
-
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4124-16T4 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR SASCO 2007-WF2, … AMARAL, Defendant-Appellant, and SOPHIA B. COSTA, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, … and an earlier March 28, 2017 order denying defendant's objection to the entry of default judgment. Defendant argues …
-
njcourts.gov
… GRACE S. WONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Respondent, and ROBERT G. SCHROEDER and 561 … January 31, 2019 order granting defendant Valley National Bank's motion to dismiss her complaint in which she again … that is summarized in our earlier decision in Valley Nat'l Bank v. 561 Broadway, LLC, Docket Nos. A-1664-16 and …
njcourts.gov
… addressed a calculation error regarding the parties' joint bank account, and required plaintiff to pay defendant … of her business. She also disputes the Family Part's joint bank account calculations, arguing it erred by "adding … "self-created fraudulent chart . . . to determine [her] bank account" lacks merit. In our remand, we held: Defendant …
-
njcourts.gov
… 4C4 MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAKELAND BANK, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ … order awarding $2,533.50 in attorneys' fees to its former bank, defendant Lakeland Bank. The trial court entered the … had been marked as an exhibit at trial. Plaintiff did not object to the submission. Rather, it filed a motion for …
-
njcourts.gov
… addressed a calculation error regarding the parties' joint bank account, and required plaintiff to pay defendant … of her business. She also disputes the Family Part's joint bank account calculations, arguing it erred by "adding … "self-created fraudulent chart . . . to determine [her] bank account" lacks merit. In our remand, we held: Defendant …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0322-23 N.A.R., INC., assignee of MERRICK BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DEBORAH A. RITTER, … on the balance owed plus interest on a defaulted Merrick Bank credit account in her name. Plaintiff purchased the rights to the defaulted account from Merrick Bank. In accordance with Rule 6:2-3(d), the clerk of the …
njcourts.gov
… for reorganization under Chapter 13 of the United States bankruptcy code. Notably, Kumar did not name plaintiff as a creditor, and Watchung Liquors did not file bankruptcy proceedings. Unaware of Kumar's bankruptcy … of claim with the bankruptcy court; Kumar did not file an objection. See 11 U.S.C. § 502. On December 11, 2018, …
njcourts.gov
… deserving litigants immediate relief.” Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co., 17 N.J. 67, 74 (1954). Thus, the court … to the purported co-mingling of assets in the form of bank accounts and real property, Plaintiff is likely to … fact even necessary, and whether or not there existed other bank accounts and retirement accounts that were not …
-
njcourts.gov
… deserving litigants immediate relief.” Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co., 17 N.J. 67, 74 (1954). Thus, the court … to the purported co-mingling of assets in the form of bank accounts and real property, Plaintiff is likely to … fact even necessary, and whether or not there existed other bank accounts and retirement accounts that were not …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0322-23 N.A.R., INC., assignee of MERRICK BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DEBORAH A. RITTER, … on the balance owed plus interest on a defaulted Merrick Bank credit account in her name. Plaintiff purchased the rights to the defaulted account from Merrick Bank. In accordance with Rule 6:2-3(d), the clerk of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… for reorganization under Chapter 13 of the United States bankruptcy code. Notably, Kumar did not name plaintiff as a creditor, and Watchung Liquors did not file bankruptcy proceedings. Unaware of Kumar's bankruptcy … of claim with the bankruptcy court; Kumar did not file an objection. See 11 U.S.C. § 502. On December 11, 2018, …
njcourts.gov
… v. Long Beach, 109 N.J. 601 (1988), established a four-part objective test for an ordinance's validity: First, the … Any financial agreement may allow the municipality to levy an annual administrative fee, not to exceed two percent …
njcourts.gov
… Prosecutor Cary Shill and Chief Assistant Prosecutor Seth Levy. The conduct alleged against the three range[d] from … and (5) . . . unprepared at trial when [counsel] failed to object to prejudicial rhetoric throughout the trial and … and argued by [trial] counsel as well [as counsel's] objections to the State's motions." As to defendant not …
njcourts.gov
… the judges to speak to a driver if the driver lodge[d] an objection after the race . . . . [and n]o objection was lodged after th[e] race." 14 A-2653-22 Third, … shall be afforded each party of record to file exceptions, objections, and replies thereto, and to present argument to …
njcourts.gov
… unit owner to pay $2,000. Plaintiff, a former Board member, objected to the special assessment. Because he believed the … of unit owner signatures. We reject this argument. "The object of statutory interpretation is to effectuate the …
njcourts.gov
… 7 TRIAL COURT ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION IN OVERRULING AN OBJECTION BY THE DEFENSE COUNSEL AND ALLOWING A POLICE … at trial. But when the time came, defendant made no objection, and L.P. testified unimpeded. We also reject … H.J.'s identification of defendant, defense counsel objected to Detective Rashaan Johnson's testimony about the …
njcourts.gov
… delinquent tax by the purchaser of the total property tax levy pursuant to [N.J.S.A 54:5-113.5] and for the purposes …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3069-20 THE ESTATE OF MARY JO MCNAMARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL and BRONWYN KENEFIC, husband and wife, DONALD J. LA FASHIA, KEVIN GILLESPIE, and 7740 ROBERTS AVENUE CONDOMINIUM …
njcourts.gov
… Paragraph 22 would not permit defendant to unreasonably object to the proposed sale. Accordingly, the judge found …