-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 13, 2022 – Decided September 23, 2022 Before Judges Gilson and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … case by questioning the victim before trial; (4) meet and communicate sufficiently with defendant; and (5) provide the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 6, 2022 – Decided March 15, 2023 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … in a car accident. We affirm. I. In 2018, Espinosa filed a complaint in the Law Division alleging the vehicle she was …
-
#09-91
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Personnel Serving on the Governor=s Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse and Related Committees Directive #9-91 November 18, 1991 Issued by: … of Treasury empowered to review and coordinate state efforts in the treatment and prevention of alcohol and drug …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0982-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF CIVIL COMMITMENT RECORDS OF S.C.S. ______________________________ … Argued November 14, 2023 – Decided January 3, 2024 Before Judges Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from the Superior Court of New …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 12, 2023 – Decided October 10, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Smith. On appeal from an interlocutory order of the … Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment Nos. 18-10-0910 and 19-02-0154. Esther Suarez, Hudson County Prosecutor, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 4, 2023 – Decided December 12, 2023 Before Judges Mawla and Chase. On appeal from the New Jersey Department of … him to pay $6,204.33 in restitution to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board and $155 in fines and penalties. In 2020 … the deductions were proper. We have considered all other points raised by appellant and conclude they lack sufficient …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 6, 2023 – Decided August 8, 2023 Before Judges Rose and Messano. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … Ravin in his written opinion. We add only the following comments. Judge Ravin applied the well-known standards …
-
njcourts.gov
… 28, 2023 – Decided February 14, 2024 Before Judges Smith and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … were prepared to proceed, placed them under oath and commenced questioning the parties about their history, the … conditions "impairing a defendant's interest in liberty and freedom in order 'to prevent further abuse.'" A.A.R., 471 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Issued by the Advisory Committee on Professional Conduct March 14, 2024 ADVISORY … of the representation without the other lawyer’s consent. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, the Committee … if the person had the benefit of discussing the questions and responses with counsel first. See Restatement (Third) of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 12, 2023 – Decided October 24, 2023 Before Judges Firko and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … considered defendant's contentions and rendered a comprehensive written opinion, with which we substantially …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 3, 2023 – Decided October 25, 2023 Before Judges Whipple, Mayer and Paganelli. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … has "a due process right to an 'impartial and mentally competent' tribunal." State v. Mohammed, 226 N.J. 71, 83 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Issued by the Advisory Committee on Professional Conduct Issued March 14, 2024 … of the representation without the other lawyer’s consent. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, the Committee … if the person had the benefit of discussing the questions and responses with counsel first. See Restatement (Third) of …
-
njcourts.gov
… FUNDING TRUST II, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 203 HANSBURY LLC and MARTIN STERN, Defendants-Appellants. … 203 Hansbury, executed a promissory note for $873,750 and commercial mortgage agreement in favor of 203 Hansbury with … order was entered that same day. Defendants raise two points on appeal for our consideration. Defendants first …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 11, 2025 – Decided July 9, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … to show cause for temporary restraints and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. The trial court ruled there was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 28, 2025 – Decided July 10, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … restraint, N.J.S.A. 2C:13-2. The alleged offenses were committed against a seventeen-year-old victim. On September …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 9, 2025 – Decided February 5, 2026 Before Judges Gilson and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the New Jersey Department … I. The facts giving rise to this appeal are not complicated. On July 23, 2024, a corrections officer …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2670-24 JESUS PACHECO and ROSA PACHECO, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. 212 PARKER LLC … Submitted November 20, 2025 – Decided December 10, 2025 Before Judges Mawla and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … was unchanged. On January 16, 2025, plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants in the Special Civil Part of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 16, 2025 – Decided December 2, 2025 Before Judges Marczyk and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … order denying her order to show cause and dismissing her complaint against defendant Monmouth County Division of …
njcourts.gov
… Road Cedar Grove, New Jersey 07009 (973) 239-5700 Attorneys.for Re5pondenl, Honorable Britt J. Simon, J.MC. IN THE … AUG 1 8 2025 A.C.J.C. SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT DOCKET NO.: ACJC 2025-257 … TO COMPLAINT, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, MITIGATING FACTORS, DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY, AND DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER: The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint. These figures have not been verified for accuracy … Type: Complaint W ithdrawn Improvement: $9,252,200 $0 $0 Freeze Act: Exemption: Applied Year 1 NA Year 2: NA Total …