njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0556-18T2 JOSEPH A. SIMIRIGLIO, JR., Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and ALLIANCE SENSORS GROUP, Respondents. ____________________________ Submitted December 11, 2019 – …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3473-22 KASEEM ALI-X, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted April 30, 2025 – Decided May 7, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and DeAlmeida. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0556-18T2 JOSEPH A. SIMIRIGLIO, JR., Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and ALLIANCE SENSORS GROUP, Respondents. ____________________________ Submitted December 11, 2019 – …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0624-17T2 BRANDON FRITZ, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted October 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Nugent, Reisner and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3473-22 KASEEM ALI-X, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted April 30, 2025 – Decided May 7, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and DeAlmeida. …
-
njcourts.gov
Published 02/2017, CN 12014 (Certification in Support of Guardianship - IEP) page 1 of 3 NOTICE: This is a not a public document. The information entered on this form will be kept confidential. You therefore must enter all requested information, including …
-
A-20-24 Supplemental Respondent Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… has long been established in this State that prosecutorial decisions in relation to sentencing issues are subject to … as the appropriate standard when reviewing prosecutorial decisions to denial a Graves Act waiver. This decision, in … note, the intervening incident between the two sentencing decisions by the trial court was that the defendant while …
-
A-0253-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
TANYA BERRY, Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: A-000253-24 T04 Civil Action On Appeal from BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC Initial Decision dated EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM June 17, 2024, under OAL Docket No. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2635-22 JONATHAN WALKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent-Respondent. _________________________ Argued July 9, 2024 – Decided July 16, 2024 Before Judges Gilson …
njcourts.gov
… the pandemic. Our "capacity to review administrative agency decisions is limited." Brady v. Bd. of Rev., 152 N.J. 197, …
default
… administrative agency is limited, and administrative agency decisions carry with them a "presumption of reasonableness." …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3934-16T1 ANTHONY MARQUES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. Submitted October 31, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez …
default
… We add only the following few comments. Parole Board decisions are highly "individualized discretionary … v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)). Such decisions are entitled to both a presumption of validity, In …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3027-16T1 A.M., Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. ________________________________ Argued January 30, 2018 – Decided May 4, 2018 Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0054-17T2 VIRGINIA GOERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. Submitted February 13, 2019 – Decided April 22, 2019 Before …
njcourts.gov
… expertise in parole matters. Our review of a Parole Board's decisions is limited. Hare v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 368 … Div.), certif. denied, 180 N.J. 452 (2004). "'Parole Board decisions are highly individualized discretionary …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0461-15T4 ELIZABETH R. SIEGEL, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP., Respondents. _________________________________ Submitted February 14, 2017 – …
njcourts.gov
… fact located in Pennsylvania. On that record, the Board's decisions were neither arbitrary nor capricious, nor an …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1557-18T4 J.W.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, HONORABLE WILLIAM H. WILLIAMS, JR., J.M.C., TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, and OFFICER WALTER WRITT, …
njcourts.gov
… circumstances. The appellate tribunal's and Board's decisions were not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. …