njcourts.gov
… Argued October 25, 2023 – Decided December 4, 2023 Before Judges Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from the … "for an in[-]being interview with [the judge] to take place in . . . chambers" and for the matter to return "for a … under the April 28 consent order were not in the child's best interest because: (1) defendant posted a picture with …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 3, 2020 – Decided March 3, 2020 Before Judges Messano, Ostrer and Vernoia. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … and convincingly establishing the four prongs of the best interests of the child standard. See N.J.S.A. … the effects of her significant mental health issues placed the children at "substantial risk of harm" and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 3, 2020 – Decided March 3, 2020 Before Judges Messano, Ostrer and Vernoia. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … and convincingly establishing the four prongs of the best interests of the child standard. See N.J.S.A. … the effects of her significant mental health issues placed the children at "substantial risk of harm" and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 25, 2023 – Decided December 4, 2023 Before Judges Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from the … "for an in[-]being interview with [the judge] to take place in . . . chambers" and for the matter to return "for a … under the April 28 consent order were not in the child's best interest because: (1) defendant posted a picture with …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 18, 2016 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from the … attempt to leave her location again. The client would be placed in more danger if she were not granted the waivers … and not protect her from violence, petitioner believed it best for her and the children to remain in their current …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 18, 2016 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from the … attempt to leave her location again. The client would be placed in more danger if she were not granted the waivers … and not protect her from violence, petitioner believed it best for her and the children to remain in their current …
default
… Argued January 7, 2019 – Decided February 19, 2019 Before Judges Fasciale and Gooden Brown. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … (Division), failed to prove all four prongs of the best interests standard embodied in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) … and stable home for the child and the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm. Such harm may include …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 7, 2019 – Decided February 19, 2019 Before Judges Fasciale and Gooden Brown. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … (Division), failed to prove all four prongs of the best interests standard embodied in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) … and stable home for the child and the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm. Such harm may include …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 24, 2023 – Decided December 14, 2023 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Puglisi. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … 3 A-0075-21 calendared back-to-back. Because they share common facts, we now consolidate them for the purpose of … manager's office of the county in which the conviction took place a petition for post-conviction relief captioned in the …
njcourts.gov
… served, resulting in the administrative dismissal of the complaint against her. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … HOLDING IN J.T.[3] THAT AN IEP[4] GOVERNS A STUDENT'S PLACEMENT AND NO PRIMA FACIE LAD CLAIM CAN EXIST ABSENT …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 24, 2023 – Decided December 14, 2023 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Puglisi. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … 3 A-0075-21 calendared back-to-back. Because they share common facts, we now consolidate them for the purpose of … manager's office of the county in which the conviction took place a petition for post-conviction relief captioned in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… served, resulting in the administrative dismissal of the complaint against her. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … HOLDING IN J.T.[3] THAT AN IEP[4] GOVERNS A STUDENT'S PLACEMENT AND NO PRIMA FACIE LAD CLAIM CAN EXIST ABSENT …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 10, 2025 – Decided March 11, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Chase. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … parental rights as to Pearl were terminated. Pearl was placed with her paternal aunt, A.D. ("Alice") who ultimately … parental rights, the trial court applies the statutory best interests test, which requires consideration of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 10, 2025 – Decided March 11, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Chase. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … parental rights as to Pearl were terminated. Pearl was placed with her paternal aunt, A.D. ("Alice") who ultimately … parental rights, the trial court applies the statutory best interests test, which requires consideration of the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 4, 2021 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … list" to assist in finding Adam a suitable permanent placement in a state facility. On appeal, defendant raises … BETWEEN COURTS IN A THEATRICAL MANNER[.] POINT III THE BEST INTEREST OF [ADAM] WAS NOT CONSIDERED[.] POINT IV THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 4, 2021 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … list" to assist in finding Adam a suitable permanent placement in a state facility. On appeal, defendant raises … BETWEEN COURTS IN A THEATRICAL MANNER[.] POINT III THE BEST INTEREST OF [ADAM] WAS NOT CONSIDERED[.] POINT IV THE …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 19, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Mawla. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … of 2 D.M.J. ("Dora") was dismissed from the litigation and placed with her biological father. 4 A-1465-19T2 conviction … the Division had clearly and convincingly proven all four best interest prongs codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a). …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 19, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Mawla. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … of 2 D.M.J. ("Dora") was dismissed from the litigation and placed with her biological father. 4 A-1465-19T2 conviction … the Division had clearly and convincingly proven all four best interest prongs codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a). …
default
… OF A.C., a Minor. Submitted October 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Reisner. On appeal from Superior … and Permanency (Division) satisfied all four prongs of the best interests of the child test found in N.J.S.A. … evaluations, who concluded that A.C. would be at risk if placed with his mother. The psychologist opined that D.C. …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF A.C., a Minor. Submitted October 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Reisner. On appeal from Superior … and Permanency (Division) satisfied all four prongs of the best interests of the child test found in N.J.S.A. … evaluations, who concluded that A.C. would be at risk if placed with his mother. The psychologist opined that D.C. …