Filters
- njcourts.gov… which granted plaintiff a downward modification of his child support and alimony obligations. We affirm. We take the … rightly affords to the trial judges," and disturb such determinations only where the court abused its discretion. …
- A-2439-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… which granted plaintiff a downward modification of his child support and alimony obligations. We affirm. We take the … rightly affords to the trial judges," and disturb such determinations only where the court abused its discretion. …
- njcourts.gov… settlement agreement (MSA) entered into by the parties. Two children were born of the marriage, R.R. (Ricky), born in … considered a change of circumstances warranting a review of support. b. Wife's cohabitation with a person unrelated by … day period of discovery on the issues of a modification, termination or suspension of alimony, Rebecca's …
- A-2594-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… settlement agreement (MSA) entered into by the parties. Two children were born of the marriage, R.R. (Ricky), born in … considered a change of circumstances warranting a review of support. b. Wife's cohabitation with a person unrelated by … day period of discovery on the issues of a modification, termination or suspension of alimony, Rebecca's …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2641-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a single argument. She contends that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (the Division) did not … wanted James to remain hospitalized out of fear, that "home support had failed her," and she did not have a plan for …
- A-2641-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2641-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a single argument. She contends that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (the Division) did not … wanted James to remain hospitalized out of fear, that "home support had failed her," and she did not have a plan for …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2972-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … competently testified regarding the medical records to support a Title Nine judgment. Lisa further argues the court … of K.H.O., 161 N.J. 337, 349 (1999) (noting in context of termination of parental rights action that "a child born …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2972-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … competently testified regarding the medical records to support a Title Nine judgment. Lisa further argues the court … of K.H.O., 161 N.J. 337, 349 (1999) (noting in context of termination of parental rights action that "a child born …
- njcourts.gov… the offense charged to make sure there are facts to support the guilty plea and to determine that your plea is …
- njcourts.gov… home page. You can also send an email directly to the JACS Support Unit at jacssupport.mbx@njcourts.gov … How can I contact the Judiciary …
- Enforcement of Orders Rules of Courtnjcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court… 5:6-5-Enforcement of Orders 5:6-5 Support orders may be enforced and proceeded upon in …
- njcourts.gov… Family Part orders which denied his applications to: modify child support; dismiss a final restraining order; vacate NOT FOR … 2024. 6 A-1257-23 garnished wages for child support; the termination of future garnishments of his Social Security …
- njcourts.gov… Family Part orders which denied his applications to: modify child support; dismiss a final restraining order; vacate NOT FOR … 2024. 6 A-1257-23 garnished wages for child support; the termination of future garnishments of his Social Security …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2734-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 8.21(c)(3). The judge made the following findings in support of this conclusion: All right. This is a difficult … considering those two documents in any way in making a determination. What is interesting though, is this special …
- STACEY GLOWZENSKI VS. STEPHEN GLOWZENSKI (FM-15-0305-17, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… and affirm. The parties were married in 1993; they have two children. Stacey filed this divorce action in 2016, and … mediator. 8 A-3034-19 To summarize, we affirm the judge's determination that the parties had freely and voluntarily … – that Stephen would not be obligated to pay "C.S." (child support) to Stacey until those rights were ascertained. …
- A-3034-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… and affirm. The parties were married in 1993; they have two children. Stacey filed this divorce action in 2016, and … mediator. 8 A-3034-19 To summarize, we affirm the judge's determination that the parties had freely and voluntarily … – that Stephen would not be obligated to pay "C.S." (child support) to Stacey until those rights were ascertained. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1107-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … AHCH. In addition, physical abuse was clinically supported by Dr. D'Urso for the [c]hildren. Is not disputed … Our standard of review of the Family Part's fact-finding determination is limited. On appeal from orders issued in …
- A-1107-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1107-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … AHCH. In addition, physical abuse was clinically supported by Dr. D'Urso for the [c]hildren. Is not disputed … Our standard of review of the Family Part's fact-finding determination is limited. On appeal from orders issued in …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5287-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the Division's case, the court made detailed findings supporting its determination that the Division presented sufficient evidence …
- A-5287-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5287-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the Division's case, the court made detailed findings supporting its determination that the Division presented sufficient evidence …