default
… 16, 2017). We assume the reader's familiarity with those decisions, including the facts discussed therein, and give …
default
… initiative. This has been clearly demonstrated by his decisions and direction through the investigation. His …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2868-19 IN THE MATTER OF NEW JERSEY SPORTS AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY RESOLUTION 2020-07, ADOPTING THE HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS DISTRICT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2020. ______________________________ …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5319-17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JUAN D. SANES, a/k/a PADRO RONDON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted October 28, 2020 – Decided August 31, 2021 Before …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3110-19 ESTATE OF OSCAR PORTILLO by the Administrator Ad Prosequendum JUAN CARLOS MONTOYA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEDNAR LANDSCAPING SERVICES, INC., CHRISTOPHER LIBERATORE, PETER LIBERATORE, …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3723-17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. MUJAHIDEE ABDULLAH, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent. _________________________ Submitted May 4, 2021 – Decided June …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2328-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CLARENCE N. SCONIERS, a/k/a SMOKIE SCONIER, and CLARNECE SCONIERS, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Argued October 4, 2021 – …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3213-19 J.R.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. F.R., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued October 4, 2021 – Decided October 27, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Firko. …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1893-19 PJSC ARMADA and ARSENAL ADVISOR, LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALEXY KUZOVKIN, ALLA ROITMAN, and YEFIM ROITMAN, Defendants-Respondents. ___________________________ Argued May 20, 2021 …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2524-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ONDRE H. WEEKES, a/k/a ANDRE WEEKS, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued September 13, 2021 – Decided October 5, 2021 Before …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1966-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN L. BOOKMAN, a/k/a STEVEN BOOKMAN, LAMONT BOOKMAN, SHAW FORREST, SHAWN FORREST, and STEVEN SHARP, Defendant-Appellant. …
default
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5569-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.S.B.,1 Defendant-Respondent. _______________________________ Argued …
default
… 450 P.3d at 807-10. After wading through the various decisions of the federal courts of appeals which interpreted … expressing a view that none of the Court's prior decisions prohibited utilization of a reckless disregard … the conflict among the federal courts of appeals and decisions rendered by state courts, that "the Constitution …
njcourts.gov
… and final disposition through the avoidance of piecemeal decisions; (2) fairness to parties to the action and those …
njcourts.gov
… The Tax Court has initial review jurisdiction of all final decisions of a county board of taxation. R. 8:2. On October … and primarily discussed in unpublished Appellate Division decisions. This is not surprising given that such an appeal …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1013-23 LEON BROOKS, Petitioner-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent. _____________________________ Argued March …
njcourts.gov
… provisions meant to enhance punishment. III. A. We review decisions construing a statute de novo, owing no deference …
njcourts.gov
… to relying on the HR Act, defendants rely on several decisions to support the assertion that the HR Act can serve … approval. Defendants also rely on several of our prior decisions to support the assertion that the HR Act can serve …
njcourts.gov
… Township on allegations of bias. In its prior deannexation decisions, West Point Island and Ryan, the Court did not …
njcourts.gov
… … SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interests of …