-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … September 22, 2015 order denying his motion to dismiss the complaint and an October 28, 2015 final judgment of … to the notice. Thus, on May 8, 2014, Wells Fargo filed a complaint in foreclosure against defendants. Defendants were …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges Suter and Guadagno. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family … to form. That order was not appealed. Defendant failed to comply with the October 3, 2014 order and plaintiff again …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … was incarcerated for a multi-crime conviction, had committed numerous, serious disciplinary infractions, and … (quoting Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 10, 99 S. Ct. 2100, 2105, 60 L. Ed. 2d …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … records is ten years after service of the sentence is completed. The requested records from 1987 through 1990 were … On November 29, 2016, appellant filed a Denial of Access Complaint. The custodian filed a Statement of Information …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Department of Corrections (DOC), adjudicating him guilty of committing a prohibited act *.202, possession of a weapon in … is limited. Figueroa v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., 414 N.J. Super. 186, 190 (App. Div. 2010). The decision must not be …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Manahan. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family … a jurisdictional decision. See Peregoy v. Peregoy, 358 N.J. Super. 179, 184 (App. Div. 2003); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-71(b)(5). …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Subutex during her pregnancy. As a result, the Division commenced the FN matter and, following a hearing, the trial … 2015, the Division filed the FG matter. Following several compliance review hearings, the trial court dismissed the FN …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … 365 days' administrative segregation, 180 days' loss of commutation time, and 15 days' loss of recreation … to 180 days' administrative segregation, 90 days' loss of commutation time, and 15 days' loss of recreation …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … and, so, we affirm. The matter presents no factual or legal complexities. Ruiz began her employment with the Camden … was injured while on duty and soon after filed a workers' compensation petition. She was still under medical treatment …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … 2019 Before Judges Ostrer and Geiger. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, … Lopez, dismissing with prejudice his automobile negligence complaint. We affirm. We discern the following facts from …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … defaulted on the loan. Plaintiff filed its foreclosure complaint on April 16, 2018. After making diligent efforts to personally serve the summons and complaint upon defendant, plaintiff 3 A-5675-18T1 completed …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … on the brief). PER CURIAM 1 Improperly pled below as TIKAL Company. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE … originally suing only Tikal, plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming NG Landscaping as a co-defendant. In May …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … beneath a non-conforming trailer on her property, failed to comply with the stop work notice she was served once … denied. We repeat Green's claims of error for the sake of completeness: THE PLAINTIFF VIOLATED THE FUNDAMENTAL NOTIONS …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … not filed a brief. PER CURIAM Sanford Roth filed a verified complaint seeking a judicial declaration of ownership of a … executed by Raymond Biaza as the seller and Roth as the buyer indicated that these vehicles had a monetary value of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … his wife, STEPHEN J. PALASZEWSKI, HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Subrogee DAVID NEIDERER, GARDEN SAVINGS FEDERAL … 19, 2018 order denying his motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, and the February 8, 2019 order denying …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … a disciplinary officer's decision finding him guilty of committing prohibited acts *.002, assaulting any person, in … shower. According to Moore, Colon later instructed him to come out of his cell to shower, and when he did, Colon …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … sale, or intent to distribute or sell, an electronic communication device, equipment, or peripheral that is … to 365 days of administrative segregation, 365 days loss of commutation time, permanent loss of contact visits, 60 days' …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … denied defendant's motion. In a written opinion that accompanied his order, Judge Massi first noted that … (defining felony murder as "criminal homicide . . . committed when the actor . . . engaged in the commission of" …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … abuse. She failed to successfully attend the programs recommended by the Division. She visited the children only … v. A.R.G., 361 N.J. Super. 46, 86 (App. Div. 2003). In his comprehensive opinion, the trial judge found that the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Certificates, Series 2007-NC1, filed a foreclosure complaint on September 20, 2012. Defendant filed a … before the trial court, that plaintiff failed to present competent evidence that it had an ownership interest in the …