-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2807-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAQUEL GARAJAU, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued April 12, 2021 – Decided May 4, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Mayer. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4920-18 JANE DOE (a fictitious name), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHARD BURKE, THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, THE COUNTY OF WARREN, CHRISTOPHER PORRINO, GURBIR GREWAL, and THE STATE OF NEW …
-
njcourts.gov
… from preempting defense counsel's strategic and tactical decisions and possibly prejudicing defendant's chance of …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3631-17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.L.G.,1 Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued January 25, 2021 – Decided July 30, 2021 Before Judges Currier …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5368-18 ROBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASINO REINVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a/k/a CRDA, DANIEL MACK, and ROSILAND KINCADE, Defendants-Respondents. ____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2324-19 THE COUNTY OF CAMDEN, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. FCR CAMDEN, LLC, d/b/a "RECOMMUNITY," Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… I.M., none of whom appealed from the Division's rule-out decisions. The Division also considered Laura's sisters, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1698-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER COSTELLO, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued January 10, 2022 – Decided January 27, 2022 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5547-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LUQMAN ABDULLAH, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted September 17, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Currier. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4454-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JARRELL SWEET, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Submitted on September 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-0737-16T1 A-0861-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MAURICE L. SKILLMAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HYKEEM …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3876-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M.T., Defendant-Appellant, and C.T., Defendant. _____________________________ IN THE …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5810-12T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DAVID RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ Argued December 6, 2016 – Decided July 12, 2017 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5023-13T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES E. GRANT, JR., a/k/a BYRON BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ Submitted December 20, 2016 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4923-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL SAMPSON, a/k/a MICHAEL PEREZ, JOSE GONZALEZ, and JOHN SAMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted October …
-
njcourts.gov
… testimony that Jackson carried guns.6 "Trial court decisions concerning the admission of other- crimes evidence …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4171-15T3 CONCERNED CITIZENS OF LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, LIVINGSTON TOWNSHIP COUNCIL, and PLANNING BOARD OF LIVINGSTON, Defendants-Respondents, and SUNRISE …
-
njcourts.gov
… program do not give rise to a conflict of interest. Those decisions noted, among other things, that unlike traditional …
-
njcourts.gov
… to determine the proper remedy. The Court reviews several decisions in which such factors were considered by courts … & Lesnick § 5.07(5) (cataloguing common defenses and decisions on both sides of the incontestability issue). For …
-
njcourts.gov
… based on an observed traffic violation and notes that those decisions reveal a highly fact-intensive inquiry. (pp. … suggested the defendant was carrying drugs. Ibid. Those decisions reveal a highly fact-intensive inquiry. Each case …