njcourts.gov
… 214 N.J. at 229. We will "not disturb the discretionary decisions of local boards that are supported by substantial …
default
… an appeal as of right to the Appellate Division from final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency." … (2018). We give "[w]ide discretion . . . to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2564-19 K.S., Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued October 4, 2021 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… an appeal as of right to the Appellate Division from final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency." … (2018). We give "[w]ide discretion . . . to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3906-15T1 JOHN FAUCHER and AMY FAUCHER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Respondents, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN and B&B PROPERTIES OF HOBOKEN, LLC, Defendants-Respondents, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2564-19 K.S., Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued October 4, 2021 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… to communicate and agree upon the most basic of parenting decisions." Nonetheless, the court determined that …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. Bd. of Adjustment, 45 N.J. 268, 296 (1965). A "board's decisions enjoy a presumption of validity, and a court may …
-
njcourts.gov
… 214 N.J. at 229. We will "not disturb the discretionary decisions of local boards that are supported by substantial …
-
njcourts.gov
… Arguments noting a potential tension between the courts' decisions in McDarby and Levine fail to recognize that … bound by the precedents established by the courts' decisions in Buckman and McDarby. …
-
njcourts.gov
… on by multiple government agencies to make significant decisions, sustaining the other disciplinary charges. The … Campbell v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 39 N.J. 556, 562 (1963). Decisions of administrative agencies carry with them a …
-
A-68-24 Respondent Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… below is in conflict with other appellate or Supreme Court decisions, or if the interests of justice so require. R. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Arguments noting a potential tension between the courts' decisions in McDarby and Levine fail to recognize that … bound by the precedents established by the courts' decisions in Buckman and McDarby. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1049-24 IDEERIA LAWRENCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ Argued January 27, 2026 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
… "courts ordinarily should not disturb the discretionary decisions of local boards that are supported by substantial … Mine Hill, 117 N.J. 376, 385 (1990)). This court defers to decisions made by local board members because they are more …
njcourts.gov
… a case who has ruled against them. That a judge rendered decisions in a case that did not favor the party seeking …
njcourts.gov
… at 131 (citing Lepis, 83 N.J. at 157). "When reviewing decisions granting or denying applications to modify child …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0237-21 IN THE MATTER OF THE CERTIFICATES OF RITA O'MALLEY BY THE STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS. ___________________________ Argued September 28, 2023 – Decided October 6, 2023 Before Judges Mayer, …
njcourts.gov
… into the PTI program, and our deferential review of those decisions, we conclude defendant has not established the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0195-23 HAKIM NELSON, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted December 12, 2024 – Decided December 20, 2024 Before Judges Natali and …