Search | NJ Courts

A-3647-23 Briefs Briefs

njcourts.gov

… Judge Carter’s October 24, 2023, Statement of Reasons in Support of the Denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress … Carter’s November 15, 2023, Amended Statement of Reasons in Support of the Denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress … Judge Carter’s October 24, 2023, Statement of Reasons in Support of the Denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress …

A-2936-22/A-2959-22 – IN THE MATTER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION'S APRIL 17, 2023, 55 N.J.R. 661(b) "ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE RULES," ET AL. (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION) (CONSOLIDATED) Opinion

njcourts.gov

… from increased adverse health effects including . . . children [who] are especially vulnerable to the adverse … to the EJRules "may request a [written applicability] determination" from DEP A-2936-22 14 pursuant to N.J.A.C. … New Jersey and New Jersey Business and Industry Association supported appellants' arguments and raised additional …

Caneiro - Order to Suppress Motion to Suppress DVR Final Document

njcourts.gov

… whether the fire was accidental or criminal in nature. In support of this position, the State relies on Tyler, as well … was not incidental to emergency suppression or cause determination. Rather, the circumstances present here more … ID: CRM2025758921 N.J. 150, 157 (2004). In making this determination, courts consider the temporal proximity between …

A-0917-24 Briefs Briefs

njcourts.gov

… J. KASSEL, J.S.C. PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT’s AMENDED BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL FROM ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN … . . . . . . . . Pa1073 Township of Winslow’s Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Attachment – Aybar v. … granted. Therefore, under the applicable standard, a determination of whether there exists a genuine issue of …

A-3643-23 Briefs Briefs

njcourts.gov

… where those law enforcement officers would not -- and the supporting administrative apparatus would not be subject to … Defendants claimed to fear that, if Trial Court’s determination that the MCSPCA was a public agency was allowed … Below) The standard of review in this case is de novo. “[D]eterminations about the applicability of OPRA and its …

A-3086-23 – SANDRA LEMA, ET AL. VS. THE BOROUGH OF GARWOOD, ET AL. (L-3957-20, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinion

njcourts.gov

… written opinion. 3 A-3086-23 I. We summarize the facts supported by competent evidence in the record viewed in the … at [their] home next door to [the Property]. [His] determination . . . [was] that the existing use by … plaintiffs' counsel "did not pursue any additional determinations after [their] on-site meeting." Based on his …

Healing at Hidden River, LLC v. Aetna, et al ESX L 2381-25 Opinion

njcourts.gov

… 2003) (internal citation omitted). "[T]he essential facts supporting plaintiffs' cause of action must be presented in … 3516 at *28-29. Other New Jersey cases, notably Findeme, support this conclusion. The St. Peter's court, while … 2017) ("Recovery under both of these doctrines requires a determination that defendant has benefitted from plaintiff's …

A-1428-24 Briefs Briefs

njcourts.gov

… . . . . . . Pa005 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Summary Judgment, filed August 30, 2024. . . . . … . . . . . . Pa005 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Summary Judgment, filed August 30, 2024. . . . . … 2024. (Pa181). Defendants filed a Reply Brief in further Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. The Honorable …

A-1050-24 Briefs Briefs

njcourts.gov

… A-001050-24 8 At no point, does Judge Acquaviva make any determination that Janico directly owed anything to the … Seigman were dismissed. 1T86-87. There is no evidence to support piercing the corporate veil at all, but even … HAS FAILED TO SHOW THAT PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL IS SUPPORTED ON THE RECORD (Da1) …

A-4095-23 Briefs Briefs

njcourts.gov

… decision regarding the validity of a local board’s determination, the reviewing court applies the same standards … When reviewing a board’s decision, the board’s factual determinations are presumed to be valid. Klug v. Bridgewater … relief, it is the applicant’s burden to produce the supporting evidence. Jacoby v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of …

S.D.L. VS. C.B. (FV-02-0827-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinions

njcourts.gov

… 1:36-3. January 5, 2018 2 A-2248-16T3 judge found credible supported those determinations. The judge also properly applied the principles …

Glaeser - DN Order to withdraw as counsel Orders and Decisions

njcourts.gov