-
njcourts.gov
… appear as amici curiae. 23 II. A. Defendant argues that the decisions of the trial court and the Appellate Division …
-
njcourts.gov
… jurisdiction in the Planning Board "to grant development decisions and/or deviations from the requirements of [the] … the Planning Board with the authority to grant development decisions, and deviations, from the requirements of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… had the potential to be confusing, given the court's decisions with respect to the admissibility of R.B.'s …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2106-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.C.J., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued November 14, 2023 – Decided January 4, 2024 Before Judges Haas …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY C-653 September Term 2021 087132 State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Movant, v. Thomas Zingis, Defendant-Respondent. REPORT OF FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF REMAND COURT On Remand from the Supreme Court of New Jersey: July 28, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1206-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff- Respondent, v. LUKE V. BAKULA, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued October 2, 2023 – Decided December 15, 2023 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
… Super. 597, 617-18 (App. Div. 2009) (quoting Stochastic Decisions, Inc. v. DiDomenico, 236 N.J. Super. 388, 395 … it. [Id. at 381 (citations omitted).] Accord Stochastic Decisions, Inc., 236 N.J. Super. at 395-96. A breach of …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3549-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LARRY BOSTIC, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted October 24, 2023 – Decided March 14, 2024 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3225-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. G.S., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued February 27, 2024 – Decided March 22, 2024 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… theory. This holding is consistent with the majority of decisions by other state and federal courts that have …
-
njcourts.gov
… entities meet periodically to consider novel issues. Their decisions do not reference particular cases or controversies …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2481-22 A-2482-22 LARRY SCHWARTZ and NJ 322, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NICHOLAS MENAS, ESQ., COOPER, LEVENSON, APRIL NIEDELMAN & WAGENHEIM, PA, ERIC FORD, and PULTE HOMES, …
-
A-3963-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
LEVINSON AXELROD, P.A. Jessica R. Bland, Esq. – Bar No. 028932011 2 Lincoln Highway P.O. Box 2905 Edison, New Jersey 08818-2905 (732) 494-2727 Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant _______________________________ ESTATE OF AMELIA BAINLARDI (mother) and AMELIA …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1013-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL T. WEATHERSBEE, a/k/a MICHAEL T. WEATHERBEE, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Argued October 21, 2024 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3862-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.B., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted February 13, 2025 – Decided March 6, 2025 Before Judges Natali …
-
A-3241-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Plaintiff/Appellant FOLEY, INCORPORATED v. Appellant/Respondent AMERESCO, INC. Case No. A-003241-23 Civil Action On appeal from: Superior Court of New Jersey Law Div. - MIDDLESEX County Docket No. MID L …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ESSEX VICINAGE CHANCERY DIVISION, FAMILY PART DOCKET NO. FD-07-1995-23 M.G.F., Plaintiff, v. M.G.M. and N.F., Defendants.1 ______________________________ …
-
A-53-24 - Amici Curiae Brief The Chamber of Commerce of The United States of America and The NJCJI In Support of Defendants Respondents
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Litig., 234 N.J. at 390.] Notably, the Court clarified that decisions about “what is reliable enough to be admitted” … represent is greatly impacted by incorrect admissibility decisions, as the resulting verdicts expose manufacturers …