njcourts.gov
… v. ESSEX COUNTY DIVISION OF FAMILY ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS, Respondent-Respondent. … Submitted March 4, 2025 – Decided March 18, 2025 Before Judges Smith and Chase. On appeal from the New Jersey … denial. The ALJ found the "[petitioner] substantially complied with all regulations and directives of the case …
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-2101-22 DOMENICA S. NARDONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and VITO J. BARONE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. AGER, III, … Argued May 1, 2024 – Decided July 22, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … 30, 2017, plaintiff and her husband Vito J. Barone filed a complaint against defendant John W. Ager III, alleging that …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 13, 2024 – Decided August 27, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … and age of defendant (factor three); the desire of the complainant or victim to forego prosecution (factor four); …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 11, 2024 – Decided September 25, 2024 Before Judges Rose and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … its course and had ended amicably. After six months without communication, defendant contacted plaintiff by phone and …
njcourts.gov
… 17, 2024 – Decided October 9, 2024 Before Judges Mawla and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … date for the summary ejectment action. In its verified complaint for ejectment, supported by the certification of … for a stay. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: I. THE TRIAL COURT LACKED …
njcourts.gov
… 11, 2024 – Decided May 14, 2024 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … Sprouts PMA members and "[w]e are exercising our right of 'freedom of association' as guaranteed by the 1st and 14th … application was pending, the Township filed a verified complaint and order to show cause on October 19, 2022, …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 2, 2024 – Decided October 18, 2024 Before Judges Paganelli and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court … squarely addressed the operation issue. The hearing commenced with the prosecutor explaining to the court that …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 10, 2024 – Decided October 22, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, Natali, and Vinci. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … plaintiff's motion. On November 28, 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant asserting a single cause of …
njcourts.gov
… ASAP REALTY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YOSEF BIRNBOIM and JUDY BIRNBOIM, Defendants/Third-Party … Argued October 30, 2024 – Decided December 12, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … (1) untimely and prejudicial; (2) excessive; and (3) not in compliance with this court's directives on remand. We reject …
default
… Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. … Argued October 1, 2018 – Decided October 31, 2018 Before Judges Fasciale and Rose. On appeal from the Board of … two back. The suspect was not responsive to the officers' commands. The suspect bent down to pick up an object[,] …
default
… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4677-16T3 E.R. and D.R., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. R.A., … _____________________________________________ NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … After speaking with defendant, a crisis screener recommended that she seek an evaluation at Carrier Clinic …
default
… 8, 2019 – Decided April 29, 2019 Before Judges Messano and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, … following oral argument. Later, she issued an order accompanied by a written statement of reasons. The judge … marital home in this case, and applied the rule. Defendant points out that Rule 5:7-4 since has been amended to exclude …
default
… Submitted February 25, 2019 – Decided June 27, 2019 Before Judges Haas and Sumners. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … colloquy and sentencing, neither defendant nor the State commented on the expungement of any convictions. Defendant …
default
… Submitted July 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Haas. On appeal from Superior Court … Indictment No. 10-02-0238 with third-degree conspiracy to commit burglary, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2, N.J.S.A. 2C:18-2 (count …
default
… Submitted May 14, 2018 – Decided July 31, 2018 Before Judges Ostrer and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, … charges and assessments. On July 6, 2015, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging: (1) violations of the Fair Debt …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4433-16T2 JACQUELINE TERHUNE and KREGG TERHUNE, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … Argued October 18, 2018 – Decided March 18, 2019 Before Judges Simonelli, O'Connor and DeAlmeida. On appeal … of a tree planted pursuant to the City of Linden Shade Tree Commission planting program, or (b) work performed by City …
default
… Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOUGLAS MILLER, BETH MILLER, and THE TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, … Argued January 15, 2019 – Decided March 12, 2019 Before Judges Rothstadt, Gilson, and Natali. On appeal from … the Board. 5 A-0896-15T2 In August 2014, plaintiff filed a complaint in lieu of prerogative writs challenging the …
default
… SYSTEMS, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and CHRISTOPHER OH, Respondents. … Submitted December 11, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Natali. On appeal from the Board of … Oh filed a claim for unemployment benefits. A deputy commissioner in the New Jersey Department of Labor denied …
default
… JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4455-16T3 ABIR ELGHANDOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a BORGATA HOTEL, CASINO & SPA, … Submitted October 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Gooden Brown. On appeal from …
default
… v. CHRISTINE N. ROSSI, ESQ., individually, and CHRISTINE N. ROSSI, LLC, Defendants-Respondents. … ignited the blanket he was using. J.B.'s domestic violence complaint also alleged a prior history of domestic 3 … 6 A-0240-17T3 On appeal, plaintiff argues the following points: (1) defendant used privileged information obtained …