-
A-2250-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… t 2 5 , 2 0 2 4] Sep tember 22 , 2024 Hon. J os eph H. Or lando , C le rk Appe l la t e Divis ion P . O. Box 6 Trenton, … l ( f i led Apr i l 3 , 2024) 11a Sta tement o f I t ems Compr is ing the Record ( f i led May 21 , 2024) 15a … lement this no t ice o f appea l once the appropr ia te informat ion has been furnis hed . To the extent appropr ia te …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 8, 2025 – Decided September 15, 2025 Before Judges Natali and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the Superior Court of … from three orders, the effect of which dismissed its complaint against Advanced Security Systems, a division of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued (A-3246-23) March 18, 2025 and (A-0457-24) June 3, 2025 – Decided August 15, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Bergman. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … defendant's motion to 3 A-3246-23 dismiss plaintiff's complaint and order to show cause (OTSC) with prejudice and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DUKE, VICTORIA GENTILE, PUTNAM CONSTRUCTION, LLC, MMR, LLC, and DAVID CARLEBACH, Defendants, and MICHAEL ANNUNZIATA, Defendant-Appellant. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 1) he was not properly served with the Seventh Amended Complaint; 2) plaintiff failed to establish prima facie …
-
njcourts.gov
… NEUWIRTH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GOVERNOR PHILIP D. MURPHY, Defendants-Appellants, and … to dismiss the defamation count of the fourth amended complaint. Because the motion judge erred in finding … argument, the judge denied the motion. He declined to "revisit" defendants' arguments regarding the non-malice …
-
njcourts.gov
… KEITH SEQUEIRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER RUSSO and RITA ROBBINS, Defendants-Respondents. … A. LECHLEITNER, and ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC., NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Grasso Jones ultimately dismissed plaintiff's two separate complaints with prejudice. We affirm all orders on appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 22, 2024 – Decided August 26, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the Superior Court of … he was armed. We reverse the court's ruling because the competent evidence presented by the State did not establish …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINDY KEOGH and DAVID KEOGH, Defendants-Respondents. … believe that a crime occurred and that the defendant committed it." State v. Saavedra, 222 N.J. 39, 56-57 (2015) …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF HER MOTION TO QUASH THE MARCH 20, 2024 SEARCH WARRANTS AND TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE On the brief: Lee Vartan, Esq. … Parkway Roseland, New Jersey 07068 973.325.1500 Attorneys for Defendant Constance Days- Chapman ATL-24-001306 … OBTAINED. A. The search and seizure of Days-Chapman’s complete electronic data is unconstitutional as it …
-
njcourts.gov
… CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, … Argued January 31, 2024 – Decided June 24, 2024 Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia, and Gummer. On appeal from the … hearing officer found plaintiff had engaged in conduct unbecoming of an employee and had misused his authority when, on …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 2025 – Decided March 14, 2025 Before Judges Smith, Chase and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … told the officer the man in the car "tried to get [her] to come to the vehicle." Two days later, H.C.'s father informed …
-
njcourts.gov
… May 6, 2024 – Decided June 10, 2024 Before Judges Marczyk and Vinci. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … plaintiff and restrained defendant from the restaurant or communicating with its employees. Sometime after the consent … than it found "plaintiff more credible." Defendant also points to inconsistencies in plaintiff's testimony, arguing …
-
njcourts.gov
… CHARLOTTE ZAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NJM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ … Submitted April 8, 2025 – Decided May 15, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, Firko, and Bishop-Thompson (Judge Bishop-Thompson concurring in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 25, 2025 – Decided April 9, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Augostini. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … near her home. 4 A-0161-23 When defendant arrived, he was accompanied by his cousin. Defendant brought up the beach …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS DANIEL S. DELGADO, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. LVNV FUNDING, … as to claims based on Arrow’s lack of license. Plaintiff points out, correctly, that because LVNV and Resurgent …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. BOROUGH OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS PLANNING BOARD/ LAND USE BOARD, Defendants-Respondents, and CR ROUTE 17 NJ, … Submitted January 17, 2024 – Decided May 1, 2024 Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … in the Borough of Hasbrouck Heights' (Borough) B-2 Highway Commercial Zone. The record does not indicate when the …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1309-22 H AND H MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. a/k/a H&H, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MARK TOMEI, Individually and as Guardian for VINCENT TOMEI1, and ESTATE OF VINCENT TOMEI2, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-2380-20 JIM KWON, Plaintiff, v. MDTV REALTY LLC, and PAUL ARGEN, Defendants, and MDTV REALTY LLC and PGA-MV … LLC, and J. TIMOTHY BAK, Third-Party Defendants- NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Respondents, and 27 NORTH AVENUE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. MDTV REALTY LLC and PGA-MV …
-
njcourts.gov
… 30, 2023 – Decided June 13, 2023 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … This matter arises from appellant's alleged failure to comply with the terms of a settlement agreement reached … in this matter. In support of this defense, appellant points to the adverse impact of Superstorm Sandy on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SVETLANA SHIFRIN-DOUGLAS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALEXANDER SHIFRIN, Defendant-Appellant. … Argued January 10, 2023 – Decided May 19, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … him into entering it or, alternatively, had increased her income such that he was entitled to a modification of his …