njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. … to - 15, which is a congressionally sanctioned interstate compact addressing the transfer of a prisoner from the …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 31, 2024 – Decided March 1, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … defendant permission to post the videos on social media and complained to him that the comments his followers left about …
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. … States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967), and develop a more complete factual record. 1. Suggestive identification …
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 19, 2023 – Decided July 7, 2023 Before Judges Currier, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … station, Gansel worked with Officer Christopher Heffner to complete the paperwork and observe defendant for a …
njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-0621-20 A-3211-21 ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY … and FLASTER GREENBERG, PC, Defendants-Respondents, and NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE …
njcourts.gov
… officers, servants, agents, assignees, delegates, and/or employees), STATE OF NEW JERSEY, (its directors, … Defendants-Respondents. ______________________________ NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Daniel Keitel (collectively, defendants) in an eight-count complaint alleging a politically motivated conspiracy to …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … HARRIS, 2 A-3911-21 Defendant-Appellant. Argued (A-3911-21) and Submitted (A-1264-22 and A- 1358-22) April 30, 2024 – … whether: (1) our Supreme Court's decision in State v. Comer, 249 N.J. 359 (2022), should extend to youthful …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0273-21 ROSA M. WILLIAMS-HOPKINS AND RANDY HOPKINS, on behalf of themselves and those … Argued November 8, 2023 – Decided April 5, 2024 Before Judges Haas, Gooden Brown and Natali. On appeal from … responded by filing a seven-count putative class action complaint in the Bergen County Law Division (the Bergen …
njcourts.gov
… III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 46 4th STREET, LLC, Defendant, and BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG and BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG WATER AND … appeals from the entry of summary judgment dismissing his complaint against defendants, the Borough of Keansburg and … were not permanent and substantial. On the first two points raised by plaintiff, the Borough argues that the …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON … NO. MON-C-41-22 TIMOTHY J. HARRIS; MEGAN HARRIS LOEWENBERG; and KRISTEN C. HARRIS, Plaintiffs, v. MARY ELLEN HARRIS, …
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2913-21 H and H MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., a/k/a H&H, THOMAS TOMEI and JANNETTE TOMEI, … ESQ., MARK TOMEI, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for VINCENT TOMEI1, and as Personal Representative of the …
njcourts.gov
… v. CHRISTOPHER MATTINA, ROSEMARIE MATTINA, BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS LAND USE BOARD, DARREN KAPLAN, and MARISSA KAPLAN, h/w, … Argued April 24, 2024 — Decided January 7, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the … the Board's decision and dismissing with prejudice his complaint in lieu of prerogative writs. We affirm. I. The …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0778-23 ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, …
njcourts.gov
… 10, 2024 – Decided January 10, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Firko. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … the Drug Court office. The court found defendant's plea was freely and voluntarily entered and continued defendant on … he was not allowed to take Kratom under the 3 "'Kratom' commonly refers to an herbal substance that can produce …
njcourts.gov
… No. PAS-L-000712-24 Civil Action ORDER This matter having come before the Court on the Motion of Defendants, Giovanni … Jr., “Crumdale Defendants”, DiMartino Holding Company LLC, and John DiMartino, by and through its attorneys, to Dismiss … that results in damage.” Morgan v. Union Cty. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 268 N.J. Super. 337, 364, (App. Div. 1993). The …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 22, 2024 – Decided July 2, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino, Marczyk, and Vinci. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … variances, and several bulk variances to demolish existing commercial structures and two second-floor apartments …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY … Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, P.C. (Sean Mack, Esq., and Timothy P. Malone, Esq., appearing) for Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendants. Bray & Bray, L.L.C. …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … A-2521-21 A-0391-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. C.R.A.G., … and Michael was not named as a subject child in the complaint. Assuming the court had jurisdiction, they contend …
njcourts.gov
… 10, 2024 – Decided October 18, 2024 Before Judges Mawla and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … [a]limony 3 A-2904-21 shall be based on [defendant]'s income up to $400,000[] per year and, therefore, said alimony … 20, 2018 order are clear and the law of the case. Defendant points to a provision in the December 20 order, that states …
njcourts.gov
… It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. … leaders of a drug trafficking network, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-3, commonly referred to as the “kingpin” offense. As to the … revised charge was considered by the Legislature when it revisited the statute. Ultimately, by considering and …