-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … as it relates to this case. Plaintiff A.E.C. (Ana)1 filed a complaint in the Family Part as a predicate to obtaining SIJ … 122 Stat. 5044 (2008). The SIJ application is a two-step process, requiring participation by the state courts and the …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … J.A.D. Plaintiff Gilbert Antonucci appeals from an order compelling arbitration and dismissing with prejudice his … Agreement set forth an overview of the arbitration process, including descriptions of the arbitrator, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Revised Form Promulgated by 08/04/2023 Omnibus Rule Amendment Order, … Statement (CIS-LP) Instructions: To be attached to face of complaint (type or print) Attorney Name (List your … the Tax Court, Part VIII. Your complaint will not be processed until you submit the correct filing fee. Shortly …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 30, 2019 – Decided July 22, 2019 Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia and Moynihan. On appeal from … standing in their yard for weeks on end. Plaintiffs complained about the water inundating their property to … evidence without resultant detriment to the decision-making process"), we find no error in the court's admission of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… INC., d/b/a MANTIFF MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … prior to the closing and a lump sum at the closing. Mantiff commenced separate actions as to Emerson and Fairview in … requested a further extension as the end of the mediation process approached. Although Mantiff claims it was unable to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendants. _______________________________ NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … several luxury residential high-rise apartment buildings comprising about 1200 units, multiple commercial retail … previously-issued approval. "A vital aspect of the planning process is the ability of developers to return to the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … to issue a single opinion because they involve only one common legal issue. Appellants J.M. and H.D. were convicted … clear on the face of the statute, then the 'interpretative process is over.'" S.B., 230 N.J. at 68 (quoting Hupka, 203 …
-
njcourts.gov
… MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SERVICES, INC., as nominee for SOVEREIGN BANK, Defendant. … Chancery Division, General Equity Part, that dismissed her complaint against defendants Gina M. McLaughlin, and her … to a clear and unambiguous result, then our interpretative process is over. We rely on extrinsic evidence of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 18, 2017 – Decided July 5, 2017 Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from … Business, L.L.C. to challenge the Ordinance, and filed a complaint in the Law Division through plaintiff. The court … to a clear and unambiguous result, then the interpretive process should end, without resort to extrinsic sources." …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 29, 2025 – Decided June 17, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … defendant's enrollment date at NJMS as July 3, 2007 and completion date as May 25, 2011. Under the terms of the … suggested "wait[ing] a little bit longer" for the check to process. Defendant subsequently received a bill for the …
-
njcourts.gov
… HOLDINGS, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Paul Jensen, and their associated entities. Despite the complexity of the matter, we endeavor to describe the … accusations. But the private nature of the arbitration process for a subset of those claims does not translate into …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 18, 2025 – Decided December 17, 2025 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … for reconsideration, noting the motion record remained incomplete. We affirmed. State v. Khalif, No. A-0854-22 (App. … REASONS) PURSUANT TO R. 3:21-4(g) IN VIOLATION OF HIS DUE PROCESS. (NOT RAISED BELOW). POINT II. [THE COURT] …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 6, 2025 – Decided December 23, 2025 Before Judges Currier and Jablonski. On appeal from the … and asserted if counsel acted differently, the outcome of the proceedings would have changed. His PCR counsel … Furthermore, the issues related to the voir dire process, specifically the questioning of potential jurors …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0228-24 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF M.L.V., SVP-318-03. _______________________ … Submitted September 24, 2025 – Decided February 11, 2026 Before Judges Currier and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … He contends this failure was a violation of his due process. Instead of being 15 A-0228-24 recommitted to the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 3, 2025 – Decided March 12, 2026 Before Judges Gilson, Perez Friscia, and Vinci. On appeal from … contained in the court's opinion. We add the following comments. I. A.T. has two living biological children in … third-degree possession of destructive devices. While being processed at the jail, addition fentanyl and other CDS was …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 19, 2023 – Decided March 21, 2023 Before Judges Mayer, Enright and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal … the Porsche and backed into the officers' vehicle. In the process, the Porsche driver knocked one officer to the … his cell phone. Rua then dated and signed the form. After completing the consent form, Rua asked defendant if his cell …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2761-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF B.S., SVP-053-00. _______________________ … Argued May 21, 2024 – Decided June 14, 2024 Before Judges Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from the … it. He later denied viewing the movie. B.S.'s furlough process was reinstated in May 2019, but two months later, it …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 17, 2024 – Decided December 5, 2024 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Puglisi. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … of counsel and on the briefs). PER CURIAM In these companion cases, calendared back-to-back and consolidated … Legislature. Courts will not intrude into the legislative process to rewrite an invalid ordinance. In light of our …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 25, 2025 – Decided August 4, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, Bishop-Thompson, and Augostini. On … DID NOT INSTRUCT THE JURY ABOUT THE NARROW PURPOSE OF FRESH COMPLAINT EVIDENCE AND THE FRESH COMPLAINT TESTIMONY WAS … discussed misconduct and trial errors deprived him of due process and a fair trial. Based on the record, there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 17, 2024 – Decided December 5, 2024 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Puglisi. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … of counsel and on the briefs). PER CURIAM In these companion cases, calendared back-to-back and consolidated … Legislature. Courts will not intrude into the legislative process to rewrite an invalid ordinance. In light of our …