-
A-3590-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… v. MT. ARLINGTON HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant/Appellant, and DOUBLE O LANDSCAPE DESIGN, LLC, Defendant/Respondent, … ABC CORPORATION, a fictitious name; and/or DEF SNOW REMOVAL COMPANY, a fictitious name; and JOHN DOES 1-10, said names … 912 Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 (973) 957-2550 Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant, Mt. Arlington Holdings, LLC …
-
njcourts.gov
… IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE and THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE. … Argued December 19, 2024 – Decided April 24, 2025 Before Judges Marczyk, Paganelli and Torregrossa- O'Connor. On … Derek W. Orth argued the cause for respondent Avalonbay Communities, Inc. (Inglesino Taylor, attorneys; John P. …
-
njcourts.gov
… TRUST V, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MITCHELL MINCHELLO and DEANNA MINCHELLO, Defendants-Appellants, and J HOFERT COMPANY, FIA CARD SERVICES NA, SCHUMANN HANLON LLC, DISCOVER … procedural history, and the parties disagree on several points, the essential facts are undisputed. Defendants …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 of 21 Trans ID: SCP20222253677 --------~--------- CANOE LAND 2020, LLC, Plaintiff, VS. MARIA NUNEZ, Defendant CANOE … VS. SANDY DIAZ, Defendant Decided: August 26, 2022 BEFORE: Hon. J. Randall Corman, J.S.C. APPEARANCES: Michael … : Docket No. MID-LT-5380-20 These matters all come before the Court pursuant to complaints seeking …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD and LMC PROPERTIES, INC., Defendants-Respondents, and … REDDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … order granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendants, Moorestown Township Planning …
-
njcourts.gov
… ID 028371985) 3 Becker Farm Road, Fourth Floor Roseland, New Jersey 07068 Tel. (973) 623-7475 hmcenroe@tompkinsmcguire.com KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP Sheron Korpus (admitted pro … JFulop@kasowitz.com ASchwartz@kasowitz.com Attorneys for Defendants Jonathan Rosenbaum and Stuart Dolleck COSMAX …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 18, 2023 – Decided May 18, 2023 Before Judges Messano, Rose and Perez-Friscia. On appeal from an interlocutory order of … indictment with: second-degree sexual assault "by committing one or more acts of sexual contact upon A.R.," …
-
njcourts.gov
… J. PLATKIN, Attorney General of the STATE OF NEW JERSEY, and CARI FAIS, Acting Director of the NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF … a June 30, 2021 Chancery Division order directing it to comply with a subpoena issued by plaintiffs Gurbir S. … and decide them; but if the case may be determined on other points, a just respect for the legislature requires, that …
-
njcourts.gov
… P,O. B\l19(;4 JUDGE NEWBRUNSWICK, NJ 08903-0964 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS Memorandum of Decision on Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment …
-
njcourts.gov
… * NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS 5/5/2023 Corrected attorney name. … filed by plaintiff, Christopher Gill, (“plaintiff”) and the cross motion for summary judgment filed by … in N.J.A.C. 18:2-6. No reported decision in New Jersey pinpoints the application of any limitations period to the …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-1580-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDRES M. CARDENAS- ORTEGA, Defendant-Respondent. … Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided March 6, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Firko. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … invasion of privacy. The indictment alleges Cardenas-Ortega committed the offenses between 2018 and 2019. In A-1580-21, …
-
#06-12
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Acting Administrative Director of the Courts www.njcourts.com • Phone: 609-984-0275 • Fax: 609-984-6968 MEMORANDUM DIRECTIVE #06-12 To: Hon. Ariel A. Rodriguez … practice and to bring the CIC Standards into full conformance with current statutes, court rules, and Judiciary …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DENNIS F. GARGANO, JR. and CLARENCE D. GRANT, Defendants-Respondents. … determined the State's interception of privileged marital communications between codefendant spouses Clarence D. Grant …
-
njcourts.gov
… -1- NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE … (EITC). Ms. Scott filed as head of household. Her husband filed as single. Since the Scotts are married and living …
-
njcourts.gov
… INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, EVEREST INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, BEAZLEY SYNDICATES AFB FOR AND ON BEHALF OF LLOYD'S UNDERWRITER SYNDICATE NO. 2623 AFB, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 2023 – Decided January 23, 2024 Before Judges Sumners, Rose and Smith. On appeal from an inaction of Governor Philip … appeal requires us to consider whether the Governor can be compelled by mandamus to act on an appointment power when …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0518-19 JAMES KENNEDY, II,1 on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated persons, … our prior opinion, plaintiff James Kennedy, II, was a fully commissioned real estate salesperson with defendant Weichert … complaint. For reasons we explain, we need not revisit the retroactive/prospective dilemma we faced in our …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … TOWNSHIP OF WEST MILFORD, COUNCIL OF WEST MILFORD TOWNSHIP, and SOULFLORA, INC., Defendants-Respondents. … (CRL) from the State of New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission (the Commission) under N.J.S.A. 24:6I-31 to -56, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 6, 2025 – Decided July 10, 2025 Before Judges Smith and Chase. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … Violence Act (PDVA)2 against him. Before trial could commence, P.H. unsuccessfully sought a TRO against J.H., …
-
A-3919-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… OF THE 1998 RESOLUTION BY NOT REVIEWING THE ENTIRE RECORD AND SOLELY LIMITING TO ITS ARBITRARY INTERPRETATION OF THE … INCLUDING THE BOARD’S UNILATERAL AND PREEMPTIVE REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER. (Raised below T4:8-10, T4:17-25, Pa2, … be taken or additional findings to be made upon essential points”). Following a remand from the Court, the board is …