-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3860-23 BEACH HAVEN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BOROUGH OF BEACH HAVEN, BEACH HAVEN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NANCY TAGGART DAVIS, in her capacity as Mayor of the BOROUGH OF BEACH HAVEN, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0161-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KAWAMI R. JUNOR, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued February 25, 2025 – Decided April 9, 2025 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
… court "de novo, 'unconstrained by deference to the decisions of the trial court[.]'" State v. Fuqua, 234 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… stolen. The State's argument requires that we consider our decisions in Lugo, and Taylor. In Lugo, we addressed the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1650-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT W. SMITH, a/k/a MOOK SMITH, and KEVIN WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted February 5, 2024 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… DepoLink, 430 N.J. Super. at 336 (quoting Stochastic Decisions, Inc. v. DiDomenico, 236 N.J. Super. 388, 395 …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.V.-C., Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… faced by defense counsel or the range of legitimate decisions regarding how best to represent a criminal …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendant as well as defendant's prior attorney, but made decisions based on his own "in[-]depth" research and …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2885-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.W.,1 Defendant, and L.R., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ IN THE MATTER …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1214-20 DORINE INDUSTRIAL PARK PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Defendant-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, and ROBERT MARTIN, …
-
njcourts.gov
1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION: PROBATE PART BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. P-218-22 OPINION Argued: December 16, 2022 Decided: May 1, 2023 Appearances: Cole Schotz, P.C. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0983-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSEPH A. BAKER, a/k/a JOE BAKER, ANTHONY BAKER, and SUTAN, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted November 9, 2023 – …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1271-21 JOHN ARTHUR ROBINSON and LUCILLE DINA COLUMBO ROBINSON, Plaintiffs-Respondents/ Cross-Appellants, v. 160 SPRING VALLEY RD LLC, and 47TH STREET GROUP, LLC, Defendants-Appellants/ …
-
njcourts.gov
… Cesare, 154 N.J. at 412). However, "a judge's purely legal decisions are subject to . . . de novo review." C.C., 463 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2567-23 NEIL CAIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROSA DIMEGLIO, Defendant-Appellant, and ANDREW WALACHY, Defendant. ___________________________ Argued October 15, 2025 – Decided December 9, 2025 …
-
njcourts.gov
1 Dear Honorable Judges of the Appellate Division: Please accept this letter brief in lieu of a more formal brief pursuant to Rule 2:6-2(b) in support of Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File an Interlocutory Appeal from the Law Division’s November 10, …
njcourts.gov
## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in …
njcourts.gov
… police, prosecutors and grand jurors who constantly make decisions as to whether it is appropriate to prosecute under …
njcourts.gov
… (1998)). However, a Family Part judge's "purely legal decisions" nevertheless remain subject to de novo 7 …