njcourts.gov
… defendants United, only); Counts Four and Five allege RICO violations and conspiracies as to both defendants. This … a successful recovery by plaintiff. COUNTS FOUR AND FIVE- VIOLATIONS OF NJ-RICO (as to both sets of defendants) In …
njcourts.gov
… was "no erratic driving, no bad driving, no motor vehicle violations, no perceived threat to any person or property . … is "no erratic driving, no bad driving, no motor vehicle violations." The legal precedents make clear that a motor …
njcourts.gov
… he violated probation, notwithstanding the nature of the violations were minor; and (3) he was incarcerated. The … or was incarcerated. We agree the father's probation violations were minor, comparatively speaking. We also agree … does not terminate until June 2019. The probation violations were relatively minor, but their consequences …
njcourts.gov
… 9 A-0487-15T2 the State committed discovery and Brady2 violations when it failed to produce Milliner's recorded …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS _____________________________________ : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAMONT PRAY, : : Plaintiff : : ESSEX COUNTY v. : DOCKET NO.: ESX-L-4107-11 : : OPINION NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, INC., : …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3741-09T2 POLICEMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 124, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, Defendant-Respondent. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2424-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. OLUTOKUNBO EFUNNUGA, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Submitted March 23, 2022 – Decided June 21, 2022 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0664-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAKE PASCUCCI, Defendant-Appellant. Argued April 7, 2022 – Decided April 20, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3149-20 E.S.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.Y.S., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 28, 2022 – Decided April 7, 2022 Before Judges Sumners and Vernoia. …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3741-09T2 POLICEMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 124, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, Defendant-Respondent. …
-
njcourts.gov
… interceded and ended the conversation. In response to these violations of the no-contact conditions of the initial TRO, … 1990))). The court did find, however, that the repeated violations of the no-contact provision of the TRO …
-
njcourts.gov
… was "no erratic driving, no bad driving, no motor vehicle violations, no perceived threat to any person or property . … is "no erratic driving, no bad driving, no motor vehicle violations." The legal precedents make clear that a motor …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendants United, only); Counts Four and Five allege RICO violations and conspiracies as to both defendants. This … a successful recovery by plaintiff. COUNTS FOUR AND FIVE- VIOLATIONS OF NJ-RICO (as to both sets of defendants) In …
-
njcourts.gov
… 9 A-0487-15T2 the State committed discovery and Brady2 violations when it failed to produce Milliner's recorded …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3966-17T3 JOSEPH OETTINGER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOHDAN IWASKIW, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for ALEXANDER IWASKIW, a minor person, JOANNE BILANICZ, a/k/a JOANNE IWASKIW, …
-
njcourts.gov
… criminal conduct toward defendant and directly related to violations of the FRO. The court ordered alimony to resume …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5420-18T3 UNDERWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK and 22 W. CAMDEN STREET, HACKENSACK, LLC, Defendants-Respondents. …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3596-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M.C., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued telephonically May 4, 2020 – Decided June 25, 2020 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS _____________________________________ : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAMONT PRAY, : : Plaintiff : : ESSEX COUNTY v. : DOCKET NO.: ESX-L-4107-11 : : OPINION NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, INC., : …
-
njcourts.gov
… the timing of motions seeking sanctions for discovery violations, nor did he cite to the requirements of any rule … when defendants had committed the identical discovery violations. Plaintiffs add that the motion judge compounded … for filing a motion for sanctions based on discovery violations. In doing so, plaintiffs argue, the court imposed …