-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … NEW JERSEY INC., a corporation or business organization, and RAYMOND J. KUTERKA, individually and/or as servant, … by determining the number of FiOS installations per day completed by the technicians in that area. Unfortunately, …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … to pay the legal costs incurred by Best Buy Stores and American Industrial Cleaning Co. (AIC) in defending a … All Cleaning caused the fall. Best Buy filed a third-party complaint against AIC, claiming that it was contractually …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 9, 2022 – Decided March 1, 2022 Before Judges Sumners and Firko. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … Union and two (2) employees representing the Township shall comprise the safety and health committee. The Township 3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 26, 2022 – Decided April 12, 2022 Before Judges Rothstadt and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … entry of judgment therein, or by filing an answer to the complaint setting forth the defendant's defense, within …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … A-2699-10T11 MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and ANDREW KATCHEN, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CANTONE … Andrew Katchen, and denying defendants' cross-motions to compel plaintiffs to FINRA2 arbitration. At the outset, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… INC., KNIGHT CAPITAL AMERICAS, LLC., KCG HOLDINGS, INC. and BRENDAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY, Defendants-Respondents. … Law Division's November 8, 2013 order granting a motion to compel arbitration filed by defendants, Knight Capital … for others." Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer, 333 N.J. Super. 310, 325 (App. Div. …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0049-14T2 RON GASTELU, JR., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW M. MARTIN, ESQ., Defendant-Appellant, and RICHARDS … denying his motion to dismiss plaintiff, Ron Gastelu, Jr.'s complaint and compel him to arbitrate his claim against … Borough of A-0049-14T2 12 Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer, 333 N.J. Super. 310, 325 (App. Div. …
-
njcourts.gov
… (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished.) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PAT HAFFERT and TERRY DOWNEY, Defendants-Appellants. … them to ownership of twenty-eight percent of the undivided common elements; the remaining four units are equal in size …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2070-13T4 ELIZABETH A. COMANDO, individually and derivatively on behalf of 10 …
-
njcourts.gov
… – Decided April 2, 2020 Before Judges Rothstadt, Moynihan1 and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … provision, which stated that a "voluntary reduction in income of either party" would not constitute a substantial … parts delivery person, both of which would allow for some freedom of movement. While these jobs could provide …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4745-14T4 ERIC M. RAUCH and SHAN CHIN, individually and in their capacity as … Argued March 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Espinosa, Suter and Guadagno. On appeal from the … with prejudice eight counts of plaintiffs' ten-count complaint. That order also denied plaintiffs' cross- motion …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 1, 2017 – Decided August 29, 2017 Before Judges Fuentes, Carroll and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … to November 2015. On January 7, 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant seeking injunctive relief under …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2805-14T2 POLIFLY GAS, INC., GURINDER SINGH1 and RUPINDER SINGH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HAROLD G. … Argued on October 13, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Carroll and Gooden Brown. On appeal … 9 and June 3, 2015 Law Division orders dismissing their complaint with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4:6-2(e) and …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-0566-18T4 A-0567-18T4 GLOBAL LIFE ENTERPRISES, LLC and 446 BELLEVUE, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF … telephonically May 20, 2020 – Decided June 15, 2020 Before Judges Haas, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Tax … 23, 2018 order denying a motion to reinstate tax appeal complaints and an August 31, 2018 order denying …
-
njcourts.gov
… 295 in Burlington County. The driver, Shonsheray Chandler, had changed lanes without signaling. There were … whether Chandler’s “consent to search the motor vehicle was freely and voluntarily given.” 229 N.J. 161 (2017). HELD: … underscored those of the trial court. Defendant points to the King guideposts as dispositive in finding …
-
njcourts.gov
… * NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE … for failure to pay taxes pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b); and for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the assessor’s …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF JERSEY CITY, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, and THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY PLANNING BOARD, … Saddlewood Court, LLC appeals an order dismissing its complaint and memorializing a decision affirming the … court generally should grant leave to amend a pleading "freely," R. 4:9-1, "there remains 'a necessary area of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Action DOCKET NO.: CPM L 398-15 Order THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Defendant, Manor Hill … summary judgment as to Count III (breach of warranties) and Count IV (negligence) of the Complaint; and the Court …
-
njcourts.gov
… MORGAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and/or PROGRESSIVE GARDEN STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, … Argued October 3, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti, Carroll and Mawla. On appeal from …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 25, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Rose. On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition No. 2013-1923. Joseph V. … conclusions. We add the following comments on the main points presented by respondent. A. Contrary to respondent's …