-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 18, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Espinosa, Suter, and Guadagno. On appeal from … of municipal court matters: The court may order two or more complaints to be tried together if the offenses arose out of the same facts and …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 1, 2023 – Decided August 14, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … Law Division's May 19, 2022 order dismissing his amended complaint with prejudice. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. I. We summarize the following facts from the record and the allegations in plaintiff's …
default
… Argued May 30, 2018 – Decided July 13, 2018 Before Judges Manahan and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … appeals from an order dismissing her dental malpractice complaint against defendant Dr. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … D.M.D., on statute of limitations grounds. We affirm. The facts underlying this appeal are straightforward. We recite …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3551-17T1 HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MEGA … Submitted March 20, 2019 – Decided April 8, 2019 Before Judges Currier and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … Docket No. 13-cv- 5755 (NY action). We affirm. The relevant facts are essentially undisputed. Companion purchased a safe …
default
… Argued September 13, 2018 – Decided October 2, 2018 Before Judges Ostrer, Currier, and Mayer. On appeal from … digital billboard. Because the trial judge improperly made factual findings and legal conclusions when the Board … we reverse and remand to the Board for a second time to comply with its obligations under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-10(g). …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 20, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … Auto because it has not joined this appeal. 3 A-2959-16T4 complaint seeking repayment on the loan, Linda filed an … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 22, 2016 - Decided Before Judges Lihotz and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … a four-day plenary hearing determined where the child would commence kindergarten, as plaintiff resided in Georgia and … order. "The scope of appellate review of a trial court's fact-finding function is limited" because "findings by the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 8, 2025 – Decided October 29, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … trial court did not consider the entire record and did not comply with Rule 1:7-4, we vacate and remand for further … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 30, 2018 – Decided July 13, 2018 Before Judges Manahan and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … appeals from an order dismissing her dental malpractice complaint against defendant Dr. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … D.M.D., on statute of limitations grounds. We affirm. The facts underlying this appeal are straightforward. We recite …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3551-17T1 HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MEGA … Submitted March 20, 2019 – Decided April 8, 2019 Before Judges Currier and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … Docket No. 13-cv- 5755 (NY action). We affirm. The relevant facts are essentially undisputed. Companion purchased a safe …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 22, 2016 - Decided Before Judges Lihotz and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … a four-day plenary hearing determined where the child would commence kindergarten, as plaintiff resided in Georgia and … order. "The scope of appellate review of a trial court's fact-finding function is limited" because "findings by the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 13, 2018 – Decided October 2, 2018 Before Judges Ostrer, Currier, and Mayer. On appeal from … digital billboard. Because the trial judge improperly made factual findings and legal conclusions when the Board … we reverse and remand to the Board for a second time to comply with its obligations under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-10(g). …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 20, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … Auto because it has not joined this appeal. 3 A-2959-16T4 complaint seeking repayment on the loan, Linda filed an … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 8, 2025 – Decided October 29, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … trial court did not consider the entire record and did not comply with Rule 1:7-4, we vacate and remand for further … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 1, 2023 – Decided August 14, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … Law Division's May 19, 2022 order dismissing his amended complaint with prejudice. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. I. We summarize the following facts from the record and the allegations in plaintiff's …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Respondent, and THE WESTWOOD, and GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants, and ROBERT RUGGERIO, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … the non-moving party, are sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of …
default
… Argued September 15, 2021 – Decided October 27, 2021 Before Judges Messano, Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the … from June 30, 2020 Law Division orders, dismissing his complaint against defendant Allstate Insurance Company on … three months prior to the move, the brothers had lived together in their 1 Longworth v. Van Houten, 223 N.J. Super. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Respondent, and THE WESTWOOD, and GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants, and ROBERT RUGGERIO, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … the non-moving party, are sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 15, 2021 – Decided October 27, 2021 Before Judges Messano, Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the … from June 30, 2020 Law Division orders, dismissing his complaint against defendant Allstate Insurance Company on … three months prior to the move, the brothers had lived together in their 1 Longworth v. Van Houten, 223 N.J. Super. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Fasciale. On appeal from New Jersey … a record of its investigation should future interventions become necessary. M.B. requests that we modify the results of … On appeal, M.B. argues the following points: [Point I] Facts do not support the finding of "not established." A …