njcourts.gov
… on the brief). 1 To protect the identities of the parties' children, we refer to the parties by their initials and to … argues that the order for joint legal custody is not supported by the judge's findings. We agree. Accordingly, we … comments to the children about plaintiff or risk termination of joint legal custody. The judge also appointed …
-
njcourts.gov
… on the brief). 1 To protect the identities of the parties' children, we refer to the parties by their initials and to … argues that the order for joint legal custody is not supported by the judge's findings. We agree. Accordingly, we … comments to the children about plaintiff or risk termination of joint legal custody. The judge also appointed …
njcourts.gov
… parties were married in May 1988 and thereafter adopted a child, who we refer to as A.C. Plaintiff filed a complaint … of $10,000 per month; required defendant to pay child support of $500 per month, provide health insurance 3 … We are convinced the record supports the court's determination that dissipation did not occur until after 27 …
-
njcourts.gov
… parties were married in May 1988 and thereafter adopted a child, who we refer to as A.C. Plaintiff filed a complaint … of $10,000 per month; required defendant to pay child support of $500 per month, provide health insurance 3 … We are convinced the record supports the court's determination that dissipation did not occur until after 27 …
njcourts.gov
… were married in 2013 and divorced in 2021. They have three children. As set forth in the FJOD, plaintiff is the parent … required defendant to pay plaintiff $234 per week in child support and $750 per month in limited duration alimony. … to court for an explanation of his noncompliance and a determination of his future ability to comply. Therefore, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… were married in 2013 and divorced in 2021. They have three children. As set forth in the FJOD, plaintiff is the parent … required defendant to pay plaintiff $234 per week in child support and $750 per month in limited duration alimony. … to court for an explanation of his noncompliance and a determination of his future ability to comply. Therefore, we …
njcourts.gov
… the parties agreed to $400 because plaintiff did not seek child support. The PSA contained the following relevant provision: … Family Part judges have broad discretion to make alimony determinations. Martindell v. Martindell, 21 N.J. 341, 355 …
-
njcourts.gov
… the parties agreed to $400 because plaintiff did not seek child support. The PSA contained the following relevant provision: … Family Part judges have broad discretion to make alimony determinations. Martindell v. Martindell, 21 N.J. 341, 355 …
BER-L-5929-20
Business Opinions
njcourts.gov
… BER-L-5929-20 - Lard-Vid, LLC, et al. v. Ground Support Labs, LLC, et al. … Business Opinion Category … …
njcourts.gov
… with” CSL, and J.K. declined the opportunity to further support his application by providing the information sought … with Rule 2:5-4(a) -- readily concludes that that determination was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. … and Poland, where he was born and lived until moving as a child to New Jersey. In 2015, he petitioned the New Jersey …
-
njcourts.gov
… with” CSL, and J.K. declined the opportunity to further support his application by providing the information sought … with Rule 2:5-4(a) -- readily concludes that that determination was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. … and Poland, where he was born and lived until moving as a child to New Jersey. In 2015, he petitioned the New Jersey …
njcourts.gov
… General, attorney for respondent New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Mary L. Harpster, Deputy … including any additional educational and developmental support he needed. They provided him with health insurance … Deference is also accorded to a trial judge's credibility determinations because the judge "hears the case, sees and …
-
njcourts.gov
… General, attorney for respondent New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Mary L. Harpster, Deputy … including any additional educational and developmental support he needed. They provided him with health insurance … Deference is also accorded to a trial judge's credibility determinations because the judge "hears the case, sees and …
njcourts.gov
… vacating a finding by a hearing officer recommending the termination of respondent Officer Daniel Fugnitti, and … was "arbitrary, unreasonable and capricious and not supported by the substantial credible evidence in the … specific offense." Id. at 523 (citing Rushin v. Bd. of Child Welfare, 65 N.J. Super. 504, 517 (App. Div. 1961)). 17 …
-
njcourts.gov
… vacating a finding by a hearing officer recommending the termination of respondent Officer Daniel Fugnitti, and … was "arbitrary, unreasonable and capricious and not supported by the substantial credible evidence in the … specific offense." Id. at 523 (citing Rushin v. Bd. of Child Welfare, 65 N.J. Super. 504, 517 (App. Div. 1961)). 17 …
njcourts.gov
… after being terminated from SBMC. Plaintiffs claim his termination was the result of his drug use and that he was a … substance abuse problems in the five years prior to the child's birth. SBMC and Yacoub's estate objected to the … counsel for the estate certified on September 25, 2017, in support of the application for a protective order, that she …
-
njcourts.gov
… after being terminated from SBMC. Plaintiffs claim his termination was the result of his drug use and that he was a … substance abuse problems in the five years prior to the child's birth. SBMC and Yacoub's estate objected to the … counsel for the estate certified on September 25, 2017, in support of the application for a protective order, that she …
-
A-1568-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… hostile work environment, retaliation, and wrongful termination claims, compelling them to arbitration, while … even if related claims were present. Federal case law supports Plaintiff’s position that her entire case should … and risk the health of both herself and her unborn child by returning to the role of Driver. IV. ARGUMENT A. …
njcourts.gov
… by competent evidence. TWC alleged, without evidential support, that Ottey electronically deposited the check … Cigna Ins. Co., 297 N.J. Super. at 202; Triffin v. Maryland Child Support Enforcement Admin., 436 N.J. Super. 621, 633 … draft, whichever period expires first. See also Maryland Child Support Enforcement Admin., 436 N.J. Super. at 634; …
-
njcourts.gov
… by competent evidence. TWC alleged, without evidential support, that Ottey electronically deposited the check … Cigna Ins. Co., 297 N.J. Super. at 202; Triffin v. Maryland Child Support Enforcement Admin., 436 N.J. Super. 621, 633 … draft, whichever period expires first. See also Maryland Child Support Enforcement Admin., 436 N.J. Super. at 634; …