-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 5, 2019 – Decided April 22, 2019 Before Judges Yannotti and Natali. On appeal from the Government Records Council, GRC Complaint No. 2016-127. Katalin Gordon, appellant, argued …
-
njcourts.gov
… _______________________ Argued November 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Whipple and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2015-3244. Arthur J. Murray argued …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 24, 2018 – Decided June 19, 2018 Before Judges Reisner, Mayer, and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Division of Land Use … construction of a shopping center (Project) that includes a competitor supermarket. The history of Village's efforts to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 4, 2025 – Decided July 28, 2025 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant committed one of the predicate acts referenced in N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE THIS MATTER having been brought before the comt by Eileen Oakes Muskett, Esq., attorney for Defendants' Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and the Comt having …
njcourts.gov
… A-5425-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. C.J.R., … proceeding, and remanded the matter for a new trial to be completed within sixty days. Id. at 470-75. We also noted … was harmed, meaning that any harm attributed to have been visited upon either girl was derived from the harm to Chip. …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-5425-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. C.J.R., … proceeding, and remanded the matter for a new trial to be completed within sixty days. Id. at 470-75. We also noted … was harmed, meaning that any harm attributed to have been visited upon either girl was derived from the harm to Chip. …
-
A-3448-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Ocean County, FM-15-928-23; Laurie Poppe, J.S.C. BRIEF AND APPENDIX (A1-10) OF APPELLANT Michael Confusione (Atty … Mullica Hill, NJ 08062-0366 (800) 790-1550; mc@heggelaw.com BRIEF FILED ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 AMENDEDFILED, Clerk of … families had their first video call, where they discussed a visit to India the following month. Plaintiff had feelings …
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0033-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. T.A.K., … Submitted August 13, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Natali. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … Division must sustain that burden through the admission of "competent, material and relevant evidence." N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0033-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. T.A.K., … Submitted August 13, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Natali. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … Division must sustain that burden through the admission of "competent, material and relevant evidence." N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-1222-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.A., Defendant, … and Susan and the child lived with Susan's father. Mark visited Susan's home often. During an investigation, Mark … result in a significant benefit for the child, she will be freed for adoption by her 20 A-1222-21 uncle and aunt, who …
default
… NO. A-4514-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.M., … ordered services for both parents which included supervised visitation. The January 2018 abuse and neglect trial … and findings by Judge Donaldson as necessary to address the points raised on appeal. In assessing witness credibility, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-1222-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.A., Defendant, … and Susan and the child lived with Susan's father. Mark visited Susan's home often. During an investigation, Mark … result in a significant benefit for the child, she will be freed for adoption by her 20 A-1222-21 uncle and aunt, who …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-1222-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.A., Defendant, … and Susan and the child lived with Susan's father. Mark visited Susan's home often. During an investigation, Mark … result in a significant benefit for the child, she will be freed for adoption by her 20 A-1222-21 uncle and aunt, who …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-4514-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.M., … ordered services for both parents which included supervised visitation. The January 2018 abuse and neglect trial … and findings by Judge Donaldson as necessary to address the points raised on appeal. In assessing witness credibility, …
njcourts.gov
… A-4931-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. L.M.A. and A.C., … plans as "pie in the sky." 5 A-4929-15T3 the children to visit Anthony despite a court order that he have no contact … 283 (1994). III On this appeal, Lisa presents the following points of argument: 11 A-4929-15T3 POINT I: THE LOWER COURT …
default
… 31, 2022 – Decided April 18, 2022 Before Judges Rothstadt and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … of a final restraining order; has never been civilly committed or hospitalized for mental health issues; has no … at a later date, the parties agreed to supervised visitations for A.K. Thereafter, the Bergen County …
-
njcourts.gov
… 31, 2022 – Decided April 18, 2022 Before Judges Rothstadt and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … of a final restraining order; has never been civilly committed or hospitalized for mental health issues; has no … at a later date, the parties agreed to supervised visitations for A.K. Thereafter, the Bergen County …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-4931-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. L.M.A. and A.C., … plans as "pie in the sky." 5 A-4929-15T3 the children to visit Anthony despite a court order that he have no contact … 283 (1994). III On this appeal, Lisa presents the following points of argument: 11 A-4929-15T3 POINT I: THE LOWER COURT …
-
A-16-24 Supplemental Reply Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… FEB 2 6 2025 • SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Suite 301 Roseland, New Jersey 07068 (973) 535-1600 Attorneys for … OF HUMAN SERVICES; SARAH ADELMAN IN HER CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTlVIENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; THE … Hospital Fmihermore, highlighting the adverse impact the free care mandate has had on patient care, the CarePoint …