njcourts.gov
… Super. 1, 4 (App. Div. 1992) (citations omitted).] However, violations of the SDA by the landlord do not entitle the …
njcourts.gov
… found that defendants had engaged in a pattern of discovery violations, which included defendants' failure to comply … drastic sanctions were available to address the discovery violations. Rule 4:23-2(b) authorizes the trial court to …
njcourts.gov
… 127 N.J. 324 (1990). Defendant does not claim prejudice or violations of his rights resulted from the delay in …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1800-19 COREY BLAND1 and VIRGINIA BLAND, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF NEWARK, CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SERGEANT JAMES …
-
njcourts.gov
… suspicion that plaintiff committed motor vehicle violations. He also determined the issue of probable cause …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0187-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAKEEM JOHNSON, a/k/a JOHNSON RAKEEM, and ROCK, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued October 19, 2020 – Decided March 1, 2021 …
-
njcourts.gov
… in their complaint they stated two causes of action for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They add that under the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5867-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KENNETH KEARSTAN, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted September 9, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Natali. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendants failed to intervene to prevent other defendants' violations of 2 The complaint filed in the district court is … The complaint asserted ten claims founded on alleged violations of federal law and seven claims based on alleged violations of New Jersey law. 6 A-0556-17T1 plaintiffs' …
-
njcourts.gov
… Act (HCSA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-39 to -48, and other alleged violations including defendant's failure to provide a total …
-
njcourts.gov
… not establish Pierce and tortious interference claims nor violations of the CRA. I In June 2013, Fulop was elected … in 1949 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:11A-1 to enforce Title 39 violations and Jersey City ordinances. 4 A-1024-17T4 about … relief in the Law Division alleging Pierce claims and violations of Article I, Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the New …
-
njcourts.gov
… Super. 1, 4 (App. Div. 1992) (citations omitted).] However, violations of the SDA by the landlord do not entitle the …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2300-19 A-2875-19 S.M.M., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.M.P., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ J.M.P., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.M.M., Defendant-Respondent. …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4210-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF C.P.M. Argued October 22, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, …
-
njcourts.gov
… found that defendants had engaged in a pattern of discovery violations, which included defendants' failure to comply … drastic sanctions were available to address the discovery violations. Rule 4:23-2(b) authorizes the trial court to …
-
njcourts.gov
… 127 N.J. 324 (1990). Defendant does not claim prejudice or violations of his rights resulted from the delay in …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4320-17T1 STEPHEN W. THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, JUDICIAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ________________________________ Argued April 30, 2019 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… its worst a complete strawman business facility. Both are violations of the [s]ettlement agreement." The court noted …
-
A-10/11-24 Respondent Response to James Calderon
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… with the Map, Petitioner filed a pro se Complaint asserting violations of the MW Law and the OPMA. Respondents moved to …
-
njcourts.gov
… against defendants, alleging breach of an oral contract and violations of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 … I cannot find it. What I do note is I agree that there were violations. But was there the ascertainable loss, . . . as a result of those violations. . . . [A]t this point, I do not have that …