njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 10, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … from a June 19, 2018 order for judgment, dismissing her complaint for the return of a security deposit. We affirm. … is limited. R. 1:36-3. January 7, 2020 2 A-5239-17T4 The facts are relatively straightforward. The matter involves a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 20, 2020 – Decided June 16, 2020 Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … cogent oral opinion. We provide the following brief comments. On July 27, 2000, plaintiff obtained a $45,000 … court accepts the truth of the plaintiff's evidence together with the legitimate inferences that the evidence …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 10, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … from a June 19, 2018 order for judgment, dismissing her complaint for the return of a security deposit. We affirm. … is limited. R. 1:36-3. January 7, 2020 2 A-5239-17T4 The facts are relatively straightforward. The matter involves a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 30, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Whipple and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … POINT 2: THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON MR. BARONE'S PRO SE CLAIMS. … Super. 154, 170 (App. Div. 1999). PCR petitions must be "accompanied by an affidavit or certification by defendant, or …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 27, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … and recorded. In July 2014, plaintiff filed a foreclosure complaint, which named Sims as a defendant. Sims filed a … mortgage was assigned to plaintiff. Finding no issues of fact about the prima facie requirements to foreclose, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 11, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … 9, 2018 2 A-1226-16T1 We discern the following relevant facts from the record on appeal. In August 2008, Robert1 and … which fees were incurred to enforce existing orders or to compel discovery; and (9) any other factor bearing on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 30, 2024 – Decided December 19, 2024 Before Judges Marczyk and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … challenges the sufficiency of the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 1:7-4(a). We affirm. … on appeal. On March 4, 2024, plaintiff filed a verified complaint for ejectment and an order to show cause, claiming …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 9, 2023 – Decided May 31, 2023 Before Judges Fisher and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … of his motion to dismiss his indictment based on his stated completion of the pre-trial intervention program (PTI). … we conclude the trial court failed to make any findings of fact or law, we reverse and remand. Grant and two …
-
njcourts.gov
… CRM2025806356 2 The misleading effect of this charge was compounded by the passage of more than two months before the prosecutor presented this case. In the interim, the … PM Pg 2 of 4 Trans ID: CRM2025806356 3 the law to the facts. First, the prosecutor in the above-quoted passage …
njcourts.gov
… of the vehicles after the impact. As judges of the facts, you may attribute such weight to the photographs as … whatever weight you deem appropriate. They are but one factor to be considered, along with all other evidence, in … to the vehicle(s) from the impact. ) As judges of the facts, you may attribute such weight to the testimony about …
-
njcourts.gov
… Such evidence can include, but is not limited to, specific factual observations of the police officers or the DRE at the scene, any alleged statements of the driver, information from passengers or other observers about the … timing of the driver's drug usage. It may not detect some combinations of drugs or newer “designer drugs” that are …
-
njcourts.gov
… LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO. 629 PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET CONSENT ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of December … matter; it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The cases set forth in Exhibit A shall be dismissed without prejudice if they fail to provide a materially complete and certified Plaintiff Fact Sheet within 45 days …
-
njcourts.gov
… LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO. 629 PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET & PROOF OF USE CONSENT ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd … fails to provide proof of product usage and a materially complete and certified Plaintiff Fact Sheet within 45 days … Following the 45th day, Defense counsel may submit an Order for dismissal of this case without prejudice if plaintiff …
njcourts.gov
… November 13, 2023 (A-3877-21) – Decided February 9, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … he ordered Griffeth stop the BMW and expected Griffeth to comply. Leahy's report confirmed that he had "transmitted … be "based on 'specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts,' give rise …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 2, 2024 – Decided October 16, 2024 Before Judges Mayer and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … (collectively, defendants), and dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. We affirm. We recite the facts … Olmstead as his "girlfriend," stating they lived together for "around [thirty] years." Defendants also …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 13, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Messano, Suter and Guadagno. On appeal from New … that both of you must be bound by and it is going to become an order of the Court, correct. BELL: Yes. KLEIN: All … of their claims, and was "fair, adequate and satisfactory." SGR sued Bell in September 2007 for unpaid …
njcourts.gov
… 1 Erroneously pled as the 2012 Trust NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Naomi Nierenberg, a cousin, Steven, and five family- owned companies, as defendants. In sum, she alleged that to a … that on remand we directed the trial judge to limit the factual inquiry to the extent to which, if at all, Princeton …
njcourts.gov
… COUNTY, INC., STARBUCKS CORPORATION, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY; A.C.E. RESTAURANT GROUP INC., and PARAMUS … September 22, 2020 – Decided October 7, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti, Haas and Mawla. On appeal from the … he was "soaking wet" and that the ground was "wet, slimy, greasy, [and] . . . pretty nasty." Plaintiff also stated that …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 20, 2020 – Decided May 8, 2020 Before Judges Geiger and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … to the Board. We concur with the Law Division that further fact-finding is required and accordingly remand the matter … point, prior to plaintiff's purchase, the two lots were combined. Plaintiff filed an application with the Board to …
-
njcourts.gov
… COUNTY, INC., STARBUCKS CORPORATION, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY; A.C.E. RESTAURANT GROUP INC., and PARAMUS … September 22, 2020 – Decided October 7, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti, Haas and Mawla. On appeal from the … he was "soaking wet" and that the ground was "wet, slimy, greasy, [and] . . . pretty nasty." Plaintiff also stated that …