-
8.62
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… trial judge may reduce or eliminate the award if the judge considers such action necessary to satisfy the requirements … the PDA. N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.14(a). INTRODUCTION You will now consider the issue of punitive damages. Specifically, you … in Tarr v. Ciasulli, 390 N.J. Super. 557 (App. Div. 2007), aff’d, 194 N.J. 212, 224 (2008) found that the New …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Feb. 10, 2021). We did not specifically address defendant's points regarding those subjects, as we considered the … resided in Essex County for years. We do not address this point, as the subject is not addressed in the order under …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … brief, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I PRIOR TO TRIAL, AN ATTORNEY HAS AN ESPECIALLY … INVESTIGATE AVAILABLE DEFENSES THOROUGHLY AND COMPETENTLY. POINT II DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW. POINT III …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … summary judgment, plaintiff asserts the following errors: POINT I THE [TRIAL] COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE DEFENDANTS. POINT II FAMILY RELATIONSHIP DISCRIMINATION[,] COUNT IV OF …
njcourts.gov
… in domestic violence proceedings both of the serious consequences resulting from the entry of an FRO and of their … cross- A-2804-20 3 complaint.1 It was only at this point that the judge detailed the consequences of the FRO, … consequences, defendant stated "I feel like . . . [a]t this point, I'm going to need a lawyer[.]" The judge, however, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … application. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I: The PTI Director Employed Per Se Policy to Reject …
njcourts.gov
… court's October 21, 2016 denial of his petition for post-conviction relief ("PCR"). We affirm that denial in all but … brief on the present appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF PLEA …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 20, 2016. On appeal, plaintiffs raise the following issues: POINT I THE APPROVAL OF ESCO'S USE VARIANCE WAS TOTALLY … TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN, ZONE PLAN, AND ZONING ORDINANCE. POINT II ESCO DID NOT MEET THE REQUIRED STATUTORY AND CASE …
njcourts.gov
… State has no objection to this request, which is made in point six of K.J.'s appellate brief. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … [K.J.] for a[n FPIC] is [denied]." K.J raises the following points on this appeal: POINT 1. THE COURT BELOW SHOULD BE …
njcourts.gov
… A. Adubato, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … the insurer. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 14, 2019, plaintiff was hiking with a friend on the Rock Point Trail of Hartshorn Woods Park, which is owned and … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I 7 A-1452-20 THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRE[TION] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … written decision. We affirm. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I [DEFENDANT] IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON … AT SENTENCING, AND FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE PRETRIAL. POINT II [DEFENDANT'S] GUILTY [PLEA] MUST BE VACATED AS IT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … entered the order under review. On appeal, Acevedo argues: POINT I THE [JUDGE'S] . . . DECISION REGARDING FORFEITURE OF … IS ULTRA VIRES AND NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER NEW JERSEY LAW. POINT II THE [JUDGE] . . . ERRED BECAUSE APPELLANT IS NOT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT 1 COLLATERAL V. PROMISSORY DUE PROCESS [THE ALJ] MADE … BEFORE AN [ALJ] AND DENYING [ETHERIDGE] DUE PROCESS. POINT 2 [THE ALJ] MADE AN ERROR WHEN SHE FAILED TO ADDRESS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In his petition, defendant raised the following issues: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFICIENT FOR … AND SEIZURES. U.S. CONST. AMEND IV; N.J. CONST. ART. 1, 7. POINT II 4 A-0754-18T2 TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE DURING …
njcourts.gov
… appeals, which have been calendared together, appellants contend the Department of Health made numerous errors in its … to proceed with the ATC permitting process, several disappointed applicants appealed. Id. at 1. We concluded that the … Part B would be evaluated by a review committee on a 1000-point scale; the request listed the maximum points that …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I THE STATE FAILED TO PRESENT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT … AND SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE COURSE OF A KIDNAPPING. POINT II DEFENDANT WAS PREJUDICED BY THE TRIAL COURT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal, plaintiff argues the following points: POINT I [THE TRIAL COURT'S] STATEMENTS OF FACTS ARE …
njcourts.gov
… TOWNSHIP, ROE'S ISLAND, LLC and AMY S. GREENE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC., Defendants-Respondents. … 7 A-2487-16T2 In their appeal brief, plaintiffs argue: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO CONSIDER WHETHER … CONSIDERING THE SUBSTANTIVE BASIS OF THE BOARD'S DECISION. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO CONSIDER …
-
A-0307-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Division, January 19, 2024, A-000307-23, AMENDED i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES … 18 POINT I THE JULY 17 2023 ORDER ERRONEOUSLY GRANTED … To Establish A “Negligent Staffing” Claim ......... 32 POINT II THE NEW MOTION JUDGE ERRED IN ITS SEPTEMBER 29, …