njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … recorded footage of defendant standing in the doorway pointing his gun at Pothos. The detective repeatedly asked … backup. When defendant re-opened the door, he again pointed his weapon at Pothos and the other officers on the …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 2C:39-3(d) (count four); fourth-degree possession of hollow-point bullets, N.J.S.A. 2C:39- 3(f) (counts five and seven); … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant argues: 7 A-4570-18T1 POINT I: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … AFIS operator determined that the palm print had forty-five points of identification in its ridges, curves, and other … a match between the two palm prints using the forty-five points of comparison. He testified that he gave the two palm …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … neglect are unfounded. On appeal, M.B. argues the following points: [Point I] Facts do not support the finding of "not …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … guilty on all charges. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT [I] DEFENDANT'S CONVICTONS SHOULD BE REVERSED AND A … Certain Offense Solely [T]o Obtain [A] Tactical Advantage. POINT [II] THE FAILURE TO CHARGE DIMINISHED CAPACITY WAS …
njcourts.gov
… the information defendant relayed was substantive evidence contrary to the defense theory. In the absence of a limiting … the permissible uses of defendant's statements at any point during the trial, or in his general closing charge. … hearing this event described on the tape. A-4534-15T3 8 POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY NOT CHARGING THE JURY, SUA …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … counseled brief on appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT'S FAILURE TO REOPEN THE SUPPRESSION …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … decision is arbitrary because it failed to retroactively appoint them to higher titles and award them corresponding … as "a part of the examination process after regular appointment, during which time the work performance and …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant's pro se petition raised the following arguments: POINT I [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … FAILURE TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH SUPPRESSION MOTION. POINT II [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … defendant limits his arguments to the following overlapping points for our consideration: 6 A-1448-18T1 POINT I DEFENDANT WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … damages. Now on appeal, Rivera alleges the following points: 6 A-1912-20 POINT I STANDARD OF REVIEW. POINT II SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and concluded that he was not entitled to retroactive appointment, back pay, or benefits. 4 A-3911-16T3 This appeal … follows in which appellant raises the following issues: POINT I THE COMMISSION ERRED IN DENYING SERGEANT SLIMMER'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … following arguments in his merits brief and reply brief: POINT I IT WAS ERROR TO GRANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH MATERIAL FACTS IN DISPUTE. 9 A-3393-16T1 POINT II BECAUSE OF THE COMPLEXITY OF THE HISTORY OF THE …
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 6, 2017 - Decided Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … asserts the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ALLOWING THE FILING OF A … HAD ALREADY BEEN DISMISSED BY 26 FLAVORS. A-5291-14T4 8 POINT II: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING THE MINORITY …
njcourts.gov
… for appellant (Durann Neil, Jr., on the briefs). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant … three of his arguments raised before the PCR judge: POINT I [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF … TO COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO CONDUCT CERTAIN PRETRIAL MOTIONS. POINT II [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … waived his right to appeal. See R. 3:9-3(d). 4 A-1788-17T4 POINT I: THE DEFENDANT CANNOT BE SUBJECT TO AN INCREASED … DWI CONVICTION IN 1979. (THE LEGAL ARGUMENT ON THIS POINT HAS BEEN EXPANDED IN LIGHT OF THE DECISION IN STATE V. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 4.1(a)(1)(xiv). On appeal, Gaines raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SHOW GUILT[.] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … convicted him. On appeal, defendant argues the following: POINT ONE THE MOTION JUDGE ERRED WHERE SHE DID NOT CONDUCT A … State v. Anthony, 237 N.J. 213, 234 (2019) (Rule 3:11(d) "empowers the court, 'in its sound discretion and consistent …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2. We affirm. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT DENIED THE DEFENDANT A FAIR TRIAL … WAS THE SOLE BASIS FOR THE ROBBERY. (Not Raised Below). POINT II THE COURT'S FAILURE TO INSTRUCT THE JURY ON THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … (App. Div. 2006). On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT RELIED UPON MULTIPLE …