-
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT … cross-motions for summary judgment in the above captioned matter, wherein plaintiff seeks a refund of sales tax …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 12, 2022 – Decided October 5, 2022 Before Judges Currier, Mayer, and Enright. On appeal from the … imposed by defendant Washington Township for plaintiff's commercial property for tax years 2016, 2017, and 2018. … trial are fully set forth in the comprehensive and well-reasoned opinions accompanying Judge Novin's judgments and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 13, 2022 – Decided September 30, 2022 Before Judges Gilson and Rose. On appeal from an interlocutory … Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Complaint No. W-2022-977-1111. Angelo J. Onofri, Mercer … the complaint-warrant, motor vehicle summonses, school zone map, defendant's driver abstract, the detective's …
-
njcourts.gov
… arbitrator concluded the SJTA had proven that Segars had committed some, but not all, of the charged conduct, and … that three days earlier, on the evening of June 5, 2015, no one was at the booth to validate her ticket. Segars had been … returned around 4 A-3898-15T3 9:59 p.m. to meet with the visitor. Segars then seemed to realize the envelope was …
-
njcourts.gov
… GARY M. LANIGAN, and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … (PSL). In 2013, the NJSPB revoked his parole for failing to complete community service, for using an electronic device … defendants' primary contentions that the NJSPB erroneously adjudicated their PSL violations in an …
-
njcourts.gov
… September 16, 2020 – Decided October 1, 2020 Before Judges Whipple and Rose. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … summary judgment dismissal of his personal injury complaint against defendant Creamer Sanzari, A Joint … the overpass. Plaintiff maintains the motion judge erroneously determined defendant was entitled to traffic sign …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 29, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Suter. On appeal from the Superior … Defendant told investigators that he and his wife were alone in their home when he "heard a 'loud crash[]'" and … to the continuing evolution of forensic science and the complexity of the forensic findings in this case, it was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 29, 2020 – Decided May 15, 2020 Before Judges Koblitz and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … fourth-degree resisting arrest, N.J.S.A. 2C:29-2(a). The recommendation of the PTI director and the assistant … to address "the level of supervision provided to someone who [is] in PTI," given the assistant prosecutor's …
-
njcourts.gov
… JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2781-18T2 VALERIE KONEFAL, ANTHONY J. D'ARTIGLIO, ESQ., and ANSELL GRIMM & … After a bench trial, the trial judge dismissed plaintiff's complaint and later awarded the fees, because plaintiff … the application. On remand, the trial judge need not revisit plaintiff's argument that her claims were not …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 7, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Koblitz, and Suter. On appeal from … to defendant Oakwood Towers, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against it, and a companion order that dismissed … On October 10, 2013, plaintiffs filed a 196-paragraph one- count complaint in lieu of prerogative writs against …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 11, 2020 – Decided April 20, 2020 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from the … affirm for the reasons expressed in Judge John I. Gizzo's comprehensive and well-reasoned written opinion. We incorporate herein the facts set …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 11, 2018 – Decided April 23, 2019 Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … recover alimony payments from plaintiff, and that deferred compensation payments were not a substitute for alimony … parties agreed that over the same four year period, the monetization of these deferred compensation grants had …
-
njcourts.gov
… STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSEPH A. RANDONE, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ … Submitted November 4, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from the … must be sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt in the outcome of a jury trial in order to be considered harmful, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 10, 2019 – Decided January 29, 2020 Before Judges Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … Plaintiff John Gaffney appeals from orders dismissing his complaint against defendants and compelling him to arbitrate … without prejudice. On the record, the trial court reasoned that there was a "comprehensive body of law" that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 8, 2020 - Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Haas and Enright. On appeal from the … are fully detailed in Judge Vito L. Bianco's well-reasoned written amplification of his findings of fact and … feet. 3 A-2936-18T3 The shopping center has a number of commercial tenants, including Stop and Shop, PNC Bank, …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … Submitted September 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Messano, Vernoia and Susswein. On appeal from … make inferences that are "improbable, perhaps illogical, erroneous or even absurd." Ibid. (quoting Colucci, 326 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 2, 2019 – Decided January 14, 2020 Before Judges Fasciale, Rothstadt, and Mitterhoff. On appeal … and granting defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 4:6-2. … were vacated, disagreed with the extent to which anyone, other than the neighbors, ever used the property in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 28, 2019 – Decided April 11, 2019 Before Judges Simonelli and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … any cooperation agreement with Jackson and argued the State committed a Brady1 violation with respect to its late …
-
njcourts.gov
… telephonically February 15, 2019 – Decided April 1, 2019 Before Judges Gilson and Natali. On appeal from Superior Court … cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-5236-16T4 Salvatore A. Simeone argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Weiner … alimony was based on "the imputation of a gross earned income of $450,000 to Husband and $50,000 to Wife." The MSA …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 26, 2020 – Decided July 8, 2020 Before Judges Rothstadt and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … by their daughter, who opted to attend Bergen County Community College (BCC). Defendant also argues that the … did not move to vacate the parties' consent order within one year of its entry, as required by Rule 4:50-2. She also …