njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … shows that the altercation ended when Groething overpowered Garret and left him unconscious on the floor. At the … was literally at his feet with his hands up, at which point Mr. Garret defended himself out of fear for his safety …
njcourts.gov
… December 15, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Lihotz and O'Connor. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law … academic year. Present at the meeting was the State appointed monitor, Lester Richens.1 After the 1 In 2006, the … the Commissioner of the Department of Education to appoint a monitor "to provide direct oversight of a board of …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. 5 A-3254-20 On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE PCR COURT PROPERLY DENIED DEFENDANT'S SECOND … POST- CONVICTION RELIEF AFTER FINDING IT WAS TIME BARRED. POINT II DEFENDANT FAILED TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the following issues in his pro se supplemental brief: POINT I THE [PCR] COURT ERRED BY DENYING [DEFENDANT] AN … LEADING TO THE REJECTION OF A PLEA OFFER FROM THE STATE. POINT 2 THE [PCR] COURT ERRED BY DENYING [DEFENDANT] A NEW …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … petition. Defendant now appeals, raising the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE [PCR] COURT ERRED IN FINDING DEFENDANT FAILED TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed. Defendant presents the following points of argument: POINT I THE PCR COURT SHOULD HAVE HELD AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … warnings. On this appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT ONE – THE COURT SHOULD REVERSE THE [TRIAL JUDGE'S] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … this record, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT ONE THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR A NEW HEARING IN FRONT OF AN IMPARTIAL PCR JUDGE. POINT TWO IN THE ALTERNATIVE [DEFENDANT] IS ENTITLED TO AN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO CONVERT, OR OTHERWISE … AND DECIDE PETITIONER’S PETITION. A. The PCR Court Was Empowered to Decide the Validity of the Judgment of Conviction …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … placed a pillowcase over his head, and tied him up at gunpoint. They forced the victim to call the building doorman to the apartment and, at gunpoint, tied him up as well. Valencia was the building …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … adding only a few brief comments about defendant's second point. Since we determined in ruling on defendant's direct … "purposely did attempt to 1 The argument in this fifth point appears to us to be only a reworking of defendant's …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, O'Farrell raises the following arguments: POINT I MR. O'FARRELL'S POSSESSION OF FIREARMS IS NOT … TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE. 5 A-1586-20 POINT II THE TRIAL JUDGE BASED HIS DECISION TO UPHOLD THE …
njcourts.gov
… mistakenly enforced an arbitration agreement found in contracts that memorialized the homeowners' purchase of … a similar litigation." We reject the association's first point because those arguments were not raised in the trial court. We also reject the third point; the language of the 5 A-2653-16T1 arbitration …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … hearing. On appeal, defendant argues the following points: POINT ONE MR. FALLETTA IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the ineffectiveness of trial counsel in the following two points: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO GRANT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the court's denial of PCR, defendant raised the following points: 1 A different judge had presided over the jury trial. 4 A-3329-16T2 POINT ONE MR. NORWOOD IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … issues for our consideration in his appeal. 5 A-2391-16T3 POINT I THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE … AND ART. I, PAR. 10 OF THE NEW JERSEY CONSTITUTION. POINT II THE GUILTY PLEA WAS NOT ENTERED KNOWINGLY AND …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Vernoia. On appeal from Superior Court of New … N.J. Super. 520, 525 3 Plaintiff's brief does not include point headings as required by Rule 2:6-2(a)(6). An appellate … consideration of arguments not properly submitted under point headings. Mid-Atl. Solar Energy Indus. v. Christie, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE'S STATED REASONS FOR REJECTING THE … brother at the end of the State's case. 3 A-1611-15T1 POINT II THE MATTER SHOULD BE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING TO …
njcourts.gov
… August 1, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and O'Connor. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law … presents the following argument for our consideration. POINT I – MR. RODRIGUEZ IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY … State's brief, in which he asserts the following arguments: POINT I – PETITIONER PRESENTED A PRIMA FACIE CLAIM TO …