-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 8, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Gilson. On appeal from the … petitioner's] failure to document dosages and times is, in fact and in law, negligent." She also found that … stated, "[Petitioner] was not substantiated with having committed abuse, but with neglect . . . [t]he harm sounds in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 12, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … 2016) (slip op. at 2-3), and shall restate here only those facts pertinent to this appeal. One summer day, as Cleatis … also highlighting a number of mitigating factors that have come up since 8 A-0692-18 counsel was ineffective by failing …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOMENICO MASUCCI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ … Submitted April 28, 2021 – Decided May 17, 2021 Before Judges Rose and Firko. On appeal from the Superior …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti, Rothstadt, and Gilson. On appeal from … granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing its complaint with prejudice under the entire controversy … prejudice to them in this subsequent action. I We take the facts from the summary judgment record, viewing them in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 21, 2018 – Decided August 27, 2018 Before Judges Messano, Accurso and O'Connor. On appeal from … Burlington County Prosecutor's office, and dismissing her complaint in lieu of prerogative writs. We affirm. In 2014, … novo review, the trial court must make its own findings of fact. In re Phillips, 117 N.J. 567, 578 (1990). After …
-
njcourts.gov
… SPIRAS CLOTHING INC., 600 KINDERKAMACK ROAD OPERATING COMPANY, L.L.C., d/b/a ORADELL HEALTH CARE CENTER; and … Submitted January 31, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Suter and Guadagno. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … defenses because she did 7 A-0979-15T3 "not discuss any factual details behind [them] that would give rise to a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Geiger. On appeal from Superior … thorough fifteen-page opinion, Judge Robert P. Becker, Jr., comprehensively addressed defendant's claims of error. We … prejudiced his right to a fair trial. We restate only the facts relevant to the denial of defendant's PCR petition. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 24, 2024 – Decided October 10, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Firko. On appeal from the Tax Court … llamas. On December 15, 2020, plaintiff filed a third-party complaint with the Bergen County Tax Board (the Board) … browsing I associate with other kinds of higher growth vegetation where the animal both grazes and 7 A-3017-22 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 2, 2024 – Decided October 18, 2024 Before Judges Paganelli and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal … denial. We affirm. I. We glean the following pertinent facts and procedural history from the record. In both the … squarely addressed the operation issue. The hearing commenced with the prosecutor explaining to the court that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 21, 2024 – Decided May 29, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Haas. On appeal from the … sixteen-page written decision setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Task Force was responsible … and the fact that he had otherwise followed the officers' commands. In order to protect the 5 A-0003-22 safety of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 19, 2023 – Decided June 14, 2023 Before Judges Currier and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … for the reasons set forth in Judge Haekyoung Suh's comprehensive and thoughtful written opinion. I. The facts are fully detailed in Judge Suh's written opinion, so …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 17, 2023 — Decided April 24, 2023 Before Judges Whipple, Mawla, and Walcott- Henderson. NOT FOR … and Michael Palcko's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and compel arbitration. We affirm. Plaintiff is a … the trial court, we "examine 'the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged on the face of the 8 A-2056-21 complaint,'" …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 23, 2023 – Decided January 27, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … the informant's allegations were not corroborated. He also complained that the police did not field test the substances … records confirming the informant's description of the target location, the suspect's criminal history, and the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 10, 2023 – Decided February 9, 2023 Before Judges Whipple and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … Dr. Bressler, writing in 2019, nearly six years after the fact, contends all medical records indicate that [defendant] … In rejecting the plea, defendant repeatedly and clearly communicated he understood the nature of the charges, …
-
njcourts.gov
… ABDEL KARIM DANDIS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HI-REV PERFORMANCE, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ … law, we reverse. I. We derive the following salient facts from the trial record. On about May 1, 2024, Dandis purchased a commercial building located at 189-193 Railroad Avenue, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 24, 2026 – Decided March 10, 2026 Before Judges Susswein and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … from the date of marriage through the filing of the divorce complaint. Defendant agreed to cooperate in transferring the … 42-43 (2016). The application of laches "depends upon the facts of the particular case and is a matter within the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 24, 2022 – Decided December 1, 2022 Before Judges Whipple and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … a claim against Green Power, arguing that the solar company served as the general contractor for the job and was … the evidence submitted by the parties on the motion, together with all legitimate 5 A-0505-21 inferences therefrom …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 13, 2022 – Decided October 20, 2022 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-3390-20 PER CURIAM Plaintiff, G.S., commenced this action against defendant, K.S.,1 alleging … parties testified, the judge rendered detailed findings of fact and entered a final restraining order (FRO) in …
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 14, 2024 – Decided May 22, 2024 Before Judges Puglisi and Haas. On appeal from the Superior … a two-day evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The underlying facts concerning the offenses involved in this matter are … The court fully explained the basis for its rulings in a comprehensive forty-two page written opinion which detailed …
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 18, 2024 – Decided October 3, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Paganelli. On appeal from the … N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to -35. We affirm. We glean the pertinent facts and procedural history from the motion record. In … defendant "had engaged in a course of conduct or repeatedly committed acts with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy . . …