njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … on ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant's second point on the appeal of the denial of that motion read as follows: POINT II . . . . B. THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY FAILED TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … The Coalition raises the following arguments on appeal: POINT I THE DIVISION HAS VIOLATED ITS STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS … the procedures required for issuance of annual reports. POINT II THE COURT SHOULD ORDER THE DIVISION TO ISSUE ITS …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1Assembly floor amendments adopted June 16, 2014. AN ACT concerning child passenger restraint systems and amending 1 … restraint 18 system, which is equipped with a five-point harness. 19 b. A child under the age of four years and … restraint system, which is 22 equipped with a five-point harness, until the child outgrows the top 23 height or …
-
njcourts.gov
… Grant Chief Justice Acting Administrative Director TABLE OF CONTENTS STATISTICAL TERMINOLOGY CASE TYPE ABBREVIATIONS … 2008, probate filings and resolutions no longer include Appointment of Special Medical Guardians or Withdrawals 2 from … By Month Atlantic Atlantic July 2008 - June 2009 June 2007 - June 2009 Clearance Inventory Backlog Active …
njcourts.gov
… complaint filed by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct in In the Matter of Robert M. LePore, Judge of the … ourts.gov/sites/default/files/advisory-committee-on-judicial-conduct/lepore-robert-m/2023-317/lepore_answer.pdf an answer was filed on Nov. 6, 2023. The complaint was …
njcourts.gov
… .judiciary.state.nj.us/attorneys/assets/directives/dir_01_17.pdf. The plan sets forth the following: Standard 1.4.3: R. … not speak English. How do I arrange for an interpreter at conferences (either at my office, on the phone or at the …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … following arguments for our consideration in his appeal: POINT I A REMAND FOR RESENTENCING IS REQUIRED BECAUSE MR. CHIA WAS SENTENCED WITHOUT A HEARING. POINT II BECAUSE THE PRESIDING JUDGE FOUND MITIGATING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the same reasons. Before us, Busby argues the following points: POINT I THE BOARD PANEL DENIED WAYNE BUSBY HIS RIGHT TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … We affirm. On appeal, Rita raises the following points: POINT ONE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ITS LEGAL ANALYSIS IN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … for plaintiff's protection. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE [JUDGE] ERRONEOUSLY DENIED [DEFENDANT'S] REQUEST … VACATED AS [DEFENDANT'S] RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS WAS VIOLATED. POINT II THE [JUDGE'S] FINDINGS ON THE FIRST AND SECOND …
njcourts.gov
… counsel and on the brief). 1 We use initials to protect the confidentiality of the victim. R. 1:38-3(c)(12). NOT FOR … of his timely PCR petition, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … The court also denied defendant's motion for the appointment of counsel. This appeal followed. Defendant makes the following arguments. POINT ONE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… 13, 2017 Law Division order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). For NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … a handgun. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I PETITIONER RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE DENIED DEFENDANT A FAIR TRIAL BY … the co-defendant of all three charges. 3 A-5093-15T3 POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY REFUSING TO INSTRUCT THE …
njcourts.gov
… was denied, defendant Michael C. Harris pled guilty to second-degree possession of a firearm by persons previously … of the car. See Harris, supra, slip op. at 3. The court appointed PCR counsel, who filed a brief that raised claims of … under review. On appeal, appellant provided the following points for our consideration. POINT I THE COURT ERRED IN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed. Plaintiff raises the following points on appeal: 6 A-2603-15T2 POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN DISMISSING [PLAINTIFF'S] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … has not participated in this appeal. Defendant makes five points on appeal: POINT I THE [JUDGE] ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN MODIFYING …
njcourts.gov
… Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney; Patrick F. … defendant raises the following contentions: 3 A-5569-17T4 POINT I THE EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATES THAT THIS CASE WAS FILED … THEREFORE THE CHARGE MUST BE DISMISSED. (Not raised below). POINT II THE TRIAL [JUDGE'S] ACTIONS, WORDS, AND WRITTEN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … assistance of counsel. On appeal, defendant raises four points: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE BECAUSE SHE FAILED TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE PCR [JUDGE] ERRED IN NOT GRANTING DEFENDANT AN … for failing to object to two issues regarding the jury. POINT II THIS MATTER SHOULD BE REMANDED FOR CONSIDERATION OF …