njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… to practice law in the State of New Jersey shall, in connection with the practice of law, employ, permit or … Law Directory, the New Jersey Lawyers Diary and Manual, and any other law list in which the attorney's name … acting, or who thereafter attempts to obtain letters of appointment from a Surrogate to act, in any specified …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … defendant approached the driver's side of a parked vehicle, pointed a silver handgun at the driver, and ordered her and … 6 A-0332-23 never identified Smith as a witness at any point during her representation of defendant. Smith's …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and unopposed, plaintiff moved for, and was granted, the appointment of a rent receiver on November 6, 2020. The … taxes. II. Plaintiff now appeals the order and argues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT EDEN WAS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … makes two arguments which he articulates as follows: POINT ONE – MR. POWELL IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING … AND CASE DISCUSSION, AND BY PRESSURING HIM INTO A PLEA. POINT TWO – MR. POWELL'S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL RENDERED …
njcourts.gov
… cause for the respondent State of New Jersey. (Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney; Randolph E. … his appeal. Defendant raises the following single point on appeal: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal in the Law Division, essentially arguing the same points for suppression that he had argued in the municipal … In his brief on the present appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE APPELLANT'S SUPPRESSION MOTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In his brief on appeal, defendant presents the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED BY DENYING DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in his oral decision. Only K.M.B (Karen)1 appeals, arguing: POINT I – THE TRIAL COURT'S ENTRY OF THE FINAL RESTRAINING … Is No Evidence That Appellant Acted With Purpose To Harass. POINT II – THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT RESPONDENT FEARED FOR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal. POINT I: MR. BARONE IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF ON HIS CLAIM THAT … OF COUNSEL BY FAILING TO ADVOCATE ADEQUATELY AT SENTENCING. POINT 2: THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FINDINGS OF FACT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the judge concluded as follows: Other than the isolated point raised by counsel here, there's nothing else in the … a mental[]health evaluation. Defendant raises the following point on this appeal: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO HOLD …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … prejudice the outcome. Now on appeal, defendant raises one point of error: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal. defendant argues the following point: POINT I [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL WHEN HEARSAY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raise the following arguments for our consideration. POINT I THE PLAINTIFF PROPERLY MITIGATED HIS DAMAGES. POINT II THE COURT SHOULD NOT HAVE DOUBLED THE SECURITY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and rendered an oral opinion. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I BECAUSE DEFENDANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … B. [Plea] Counsel Failed to File a Motion to Suppress. POINT II DEFENDANT HAS MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I THE LAW DIVISION JUDGE FAILED TO AFFORD APPELLANT … THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION POINT II APPELLANT'S RIGHT TO DIRECT APPEAL WAS DENIED DUE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant appealed, raising the following arguments: POINT ONE MR. COMPANIONI IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY … Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 4 A-2232-19 POINT TWO THE PCR COURT'S RULING THAT MR. COMPANIONI'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … defendant now appeals, raising the following arguments: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S … Insisted On Going To Trial But For Such Deficient Advice. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRED WHERE IT DID NOT CONDUCT AN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … he raises the following two contentions for the first time: POINT I THE COURT'S FAILURE TO INQUIRE IF THE APPELLANT WOULD BENEFIT FROM THE AID OF A COURT APPOINTED INTERPRETER VIOLATED APPELLANT'S FUNDAMENTAL DUE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant alleges the following errors on appeal: POINT I THE GUILTY PLEA TO N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26B WAS NOT VALID … STATE V. SLATER.[1] 1 198 N.J. 145 (2009). 5 A-1687-19 POINT II THIS COURT SHOULD REVERSE THE DENIAL OF GENTNER'S …
njcourts.gov
… provided the medical practices and doctors lavish parties, concert and sports tickets to further their scheme. The … away this mandate is puzzling and unpersuasive. Lastly, as pointed out in the CURE’s brief, the documents relied upon … answers to plaintiff’s complaint. Moreover, CURE’s Decision Point Review Plans and the Summit defendants’ Assignment of …