njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals, arguing in a single point that: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN SUMMARILY DENYING … communication with counsel prejudiced him. The judge also pointed out that counsel met with defendant "multiple" times …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT ONE The Exhibits Offered by Defendant at Trial and … Were Summaries Properly Admissible under [N.J.R.E.] 1006. POINT TWO The Trial Court’s Factual Finding as to the Amount …
njcourts.gov
… January 10, 2019 – Decided July 26, 2019 Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … On appeal, defendant argues the following: 6 A-0198-17T2 POINT I: THE DENIAL OF A POST-TRIAL GRAVES ACT WAIVER … AND IS ENTITLED TO A HEARING BEFORE THE ASSIGNMENT JUDGE. POINT II: ROBERT BILLARD WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS AND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … a guilty plea. Because we agree with the State's first point, we need not reach the second. Deciding to admit a … number and was not only loaded but loaded with hollow point bullets. The prosecutor was fully justified in …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I CONTRARY TO THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 11, … ELIGIBLE FOR THE TERMINATION OF MEGAN'S LAW REQUIREMENTS. POINT II CONTRARY TO THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 11, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … omission. On appeal, defendant raises two issues, arguing: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT THE POLICE … THE WARRANT APPLICATION WAS NOT DELIBERATE OR RECKLESS. POINT II 6 A-5871-17T4 THE WARRANT JUDGE WOULD NOT HAVE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We already addressed the issue raised in D.A.'s first point in the companion appeal. Therefore, we now address the argument raised in D.A.s second point. N.J.A.C. 10:71-3.6 addresses change of county of …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … or vacate the judgment. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE JUDGE'S DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS … ABSENCE AFTER SHE WAS INSTRUCTED NOT TO COME TO COURT. POINT II THE [JUDGE] NEVER TOOK THE TIME TO HEAR FROM THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE [PCR] COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S … C. FAILURE OF PCR COURT TO CONDUCT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. POINT II: THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FINDINGS OF FACT …
njcourts.gov
… has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In this breach of contract case, plaintiff appeals from a July 16, 2019 … plaintiff raises the following arguments: 5 A-5295-18T1 [POINT I] THE [JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST … A JUDGMENT BASED ON LIES IS NOT A FAIR AND JUST ONE. [POINT II] THE JUDGMENT IS BASED ON THE FALSE ASSUMPTION THAT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant argued he was dissatisfied with his court appointed trial counsel. He also claimed no gun was recovered … is to ignore the truth of life, which is that anybody who points a gun or uses a gun toward another person is …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … challenges the denial of his PCR petition on two grounds: POINT I – THE COURT ERRED IN DENYING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING … AGREEMENT THAT HE CHOSE TO ACCEPT ON ADVICE OF COUNSEL. POINT II – THE COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … FET. Hohsfield argues the following on appeal: POINT I THE PAROLE BOARD'S DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS AND SHOULD BE OVERTURNED POINT II 5 A-1019-19 MR. HOHSFIELD'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE SECOND FACTOR UNDER SILVER V. SILVER WAS NOT MET … to [S]eparate the [P]arties without [E]ntering a [FRO]. POINT II 4 A-2209-20 THE PREDICATE ACT OF SIMPLE ASSAULT WAS …
njcourts.gov
… SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WDICIAL CONDUCT DOCKET NO. ACJC 2017-059 … Admitted. 3. Denied as stated, except to admit that at some point in time late in the evening of November 11, 2016, or … proofs. 7. Admitted. 8. Admitted. 9. Admits that at some point after the field sobriety tests were performed and …
njcourts.gov
… guilty to an accusation of third-degree possession of controlled dangerous substances (cocaine) with intent to … ineffective assistance. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT'S ORDER SHOULD BE REVERSED AND THE … STRICKLAND3 STANDARD OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. POINT TWO THE [PCR] COURT MISAPPLIED ITS DISCRETION IN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the public policy concerns. She concluded: At this point, given the foregoing, the Court will deny the motion … Court will certainly do an in camera review, but at this point the Court finds that these records are certainly …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of his petition for post- conviction relief (PCR), arguing: POINT I BECAUSE COUNSEL DID NOT CORRECTLY EXPLAIN TO HIS … TO BE SERVED, PERFORMANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE. POINT II BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … However, appellate counsel then affirmatively withdrew the point. [APPELLATE COUNSEL]: But I agree that this court has … than eight years. [THE COURT]: Well, in your sheet you pointed out the factual basis as well as the term. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. On this appeal, plaintiff presents the following points of argument: I. HIGHEST AND BEST USE II. STANDARD OF … A MANIFESTLY UNJUST RESULT While presented in multiple points, plaintiff's argument is limited to one central …