
Filters
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … without an evidentiary hearing. He argues on appeal: POINT I DEFENDANT'S CLAIMS THAT HIS PLEA COUNSEL WAS … RELIEF, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. POINT II APPELLATE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. NERI R. SANCHEZ (15-06-0684, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … for our consideration, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – IT WAS ERROR TO ADMIT THE IRRELEVANT AND … admission of the evidence tying Sanchez to drugs and gangs. POINT II – THE SENTENCE OF 60 YEARS, 51 YEARS WITHOUT …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. PATRICK HEALY (15-08-0563, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … you assess that scene, what did you do with him? A. At that point once I saw the laceration and he couldn’t put his … an ambulance because medical treatment comes first at that point. Q. And did you ask for his identification? A. I asked …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CHIWUEZE E. EBERE (15-11-1351, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I - THE HEARING COURT SHOULD HAVE SUPPRESSED THE … U.S. CONST. AMENDS. IV, XIV; N.J. CONST. ART. I, PARA. 7. POINT II - A RESENTENCING SHOULD OCCUR BECAUSE THE COURT …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … for attempted murder, entered a bar in Perth Amboy and pointed a gun at Edward Gonzalez. Under Indictment No. … being released. After considering defendant's and his appointed counsel's submissions along with the oral arguments …
- njcourts.gov… Lodeserto, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. He argues: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT AN … CHARGE FOR THE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ARMED ROBBERY CHARGE. POINT II THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT AN …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … prosecutor's failure to appear on the trial date. The judge pointed out that despite the application for reconsideration … the child's best interest." The State argues the following points of error: 1. THE STATE'S RULE 4:50-1 MOTION SHOULD …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. The county raises the following arguments. POINT I THE COUNTY MAY AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES … WITHOUT A PUBLIC BID IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.J.S.A. 40A:11-5. POINT II THE COUNTY MAY AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES …
- J.E. VS. S.Q. (FV-04-0590-20, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … for an FRO. The entirety of the court's opinion on this point is as follows: As far as [J.E.'s] restraining order … the following arguments for our consideration. 7 A-0840-19 POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW, IN RULING …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LAZARO R. GUITEREZ (14-09-1377, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 42, 58 (1987). 7 A-0810-19 imprisonment." Judge Kazlau also pointed out that defendant declined additional time to speak … This appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises a single point for our consideration: [DEFENDANT] IS ENTITLED TO AN …
- GARY MCNICHOL VS. ROUTE ONE CORP., ET AL. (L-4514-17, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … he was able to reduce the balance due to $2000. At that point, Sansone "wrote off" plaintiff's remaining debt. In … reason for its decision, plaintiff cannot "point to some evidence, direct or circumstantial, from which …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LANCE A. FULTON (11-02-0440, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the gang leader arrived. Hawkins was severely beaten to the point that nearly every bone in his face was broken. He died … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I AS DEFENDANT PRESENTED A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF …
- RALPH DYKE VS. JOHN J. PISANO, ET AL. (L-3317-19, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 4:21A-1(a)(2). Codefendant Steven Isaacson was the court- appointed arbitrator. Isaacson, crediting plaintiff's account … apparently unaware of Isaacson's role as the court-appointed arbitrator, engaged 2 It is disputed whether …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the defendants have violated" the standard of care. At that point, plaintiff argued his case was actually a breach of … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I [THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … his legal arguments under appropriate and distinctive point headings in violation of Rule 2:6-2(a)(6).5 Therefore, … for the appellant . . . shall be divided, under appropriate point headings, distinctively printed or typed, into as many …
- njcourts.gov… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3643-20 PINNACLE CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY IGNORING CASELAW … Trade In Restrictive Covenants Of An Employment Agreement. POINT II PINNACLE IS IN BREACH FOR NOT PAYING HERMAN HIS …
- Family - Standards for Child Custody and Parenting Time Investigation Reports Administrative Directivesnjcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives… Family Division, these standards were recommended by the Conference of Family Presiding Judges and endorsed by the … that there are psychological or psychiatric issues that point to the necessity for such evaluations. An exception … that there are psychological or psychiatric issues that point to the necessity for such evaluations. An exception …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … claimed her family members also were in danger. At some point thereafter, C.D. acquiesced and defendant allegedly … himself as "Abe," and employed the same ruse. At some point, defendant placed A.J. on a three-way phone call with …
- EUGENIA T. BURCH VS. KINDLE FORD (DC-000633-21, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … defendant while it was in possession of her car. At some point after the vehicle was delivered to the lot, … the vehicle's value at the time the loss occurred. On this point, we agree. 11 A-1013-21 As a general proposition, the …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Bogaard. Now on appeal, the Belmontes allege the following points of error: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING THE BOGAARD …