-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, … was "fully satisfied" with his attorney's "legal advice and services." He specifically expressed his satisfaction with …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … B. Reed considered and rejected those arguments in his comprehensive oral opinion issued on May 19, 2016. After … the reasons stated in Judge Reed's opinion. We add these comments. 1 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). 3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges O'Connor and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, … opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). We add only the following brief comments.2 Defendant's contention he is entitled to jail …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Triffin appeals from the July 26, 2016 order dismissing his complaint after a bench trial. We affirm substantially for … a dishonored payroll check from Fair Lawn Financial Services d/b/a United Check Cashing (United). The check in …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, … and vacated the obstruction conviction. Id. at 6-7. Having complied with the remand order, we stated: "The Supreme …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, … equivalent" of the no adverse inference charge and completed a questionnaire indicating they would presume …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Warren County, … N.J. 518, 540 (2013); see also State v. O'Donnell, 435 N.J. Super. 351, 373 (App. Div. 2014) ("If 4 A-0976-16T1 a court …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4801-16T3 21ST CENTURY PINNACLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.C. WINGS, LLC, d/b/a HOOTERS RESTAURANT and ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Jay Nelkin, and Viridian Resources, L.L.C. filed a verified complaint and order to show cause in replevin, seeking … personal property. But the allegations in plaintiffs' complaint include additional counts seeking to establish …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … in the PCR judge's opinion, adding only the following comments. To establish a prima facie case of ineffective … assistance of counsel, a defendant must present legally competent evidence rather than "bald assertions." See State …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … September 6, 2018, plaintiff, defendant's landlord, filed a complaint for non-payment of rent against defendant in the … not proceed with the Marini hearing until the appeal was completed as it involved the same claims. The judge stated: …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … of tampering with public records, falsifying records, computer theft, as well as second, third, and fourth-degree … plea, denied her motion to withdraw, and imposed the recommended sentence. On appeal defendant argues the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … v. PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE d/b/a PLYMOUTH ROCK MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY d/b/a HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. _____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges Rothstadt and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, … Tarantino's concise written opinion. We add the following comments. The test for granting a new trial based on …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … 2, 2021 Before Judges Whipple and Rose. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cape May County, … is entitled to our deference. See State v. Russo, 333 N.J. Super. 119, 137 (App. Div. 2000) (recognizing "a motion for …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … as to his involvement, or lack thereof, in the planning and committing of the July 30, 1988 robbery and homicide would … 218 (1967). 4 A-3711-18 POINT II TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE CRUCIAL FACTS OF THE CASE WITH DEFENDANT AND THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … of Corrections imposing disciplinary sanctions upon him for committing prohibited act *.203 (the possession or … administrative 3 A-0918-18T4 segregation, 120 days loss of commutation time, 15 days loss of recreation privileges, 365 …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … despite the Division's efforts, Nancy consistently refused services, and the Division's expert found that she was unfit … her resource parents want the adoption to proceed. In his comprehensive opinion, Judge Miller found that the Division …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … 2C:39-5(b). The plea was conditioned on the State recommending a sentence of probation and 220 days of … 2C:35-5(a)(1), (b)(3). The State, in exchange, agreed to recommend a sentence of probation and 220 days in the county …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County, … EARLIER ARRIVED AT THE SCENE AND FOUND NO CRIME WAS BEING COMMITTED. We find insufficient merit in this argument to …