njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … (JOC) and sentence, and raises the following issues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN CHARGING THE JURY … DEFENDANT, AND HAD EACH ENTERED PLEAS TO SIMPLE ASSAULT. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO CHARGE …
njcourts.gov
… of counsel and on the brief). 1 We use initials to preserve confidentiality of the child victim in accordance with R. … was excessive. We reject defendant's first two points but agree with one aspect of his third point: the judge's general unanimity instruction was …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … petition." Id. at 2. 5 A-4787-18 On remand, counsel was appointed to represent defendant. The amended petition stated: … twenty-five years since defendant was charged. The State pointed out that neither the physical evidence nor the court …
njcourts.gov
… Division's March 4, 2022 order denying two motions for reconsideration of that court's February 11, 2022 order, which … II. In his appeal plaintiff initially raised three points before us: POINT I: THIS COURT MUST GRANT PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT'S MOTION …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of law. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I There is insufficient evidence [the officer] had … of [N.J.S.A.] 39:3-75 was a mistake of fact and law. POINT II There is insufficient evidence [the officer] had …
njcourts.gov
… Public Defender, of counsel and on the briefs). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6(c).1 On appeal, defendant raises two points for our consideration: POINT I THERE WAS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEARCH DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the following issues for our consideration in his appeal: POINT I A REMAND SHOULD OCCUR BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT … PAGES. U.S. CONST. AMEND. XIV; N.J. CONST. ART. I, PARA. 1. POINT II THE COURT'S REFUSAL TO EXCUSE THE LATENESS OF THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I: THE PCR COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED A NEW TRIAL BECAUSE OF THE STATE'S DISCOVERY VIOLATION. POINT II: THE [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … was "very late" to visit Jerry which agitated her to the point that she needed help from the staff to calm down … time Jane was bathing Jerry, Jane was screaming at her and pointing fingers, insisting that Williams view Jerry's …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … raised by Young. I. On appeal, Bouie raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I REVERSAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE COURT REFUSED TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … counseled brief on this appeal, he raises the following points: POINT I. THE MOTION COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED DEFENDANT A …
njcourts.gov
… STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CLARENCE N. SCONIERS, a/k/a SMOKIE SCONIER, and CLARNECE SCONIERS, … now raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE IMPROPER ADMISSION OF THE LEAD DETECTIVE'S LAY … REVERSAL OF DEFENDANT'S CONVICTIONS. (Not Raised Below). POINT II THE COURT ERRED IN PERMITTING THE VICTIMS TO MAKE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 7 A-2859-15T3 On appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE DEFENDANT'S RIGHTS TO CONFRONTATION AND DUE …
-
A-1523-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Appellate Division, May 15, 2024, A-001523-23 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES … 6 POINT I. THE STANDARD OF REVIEW (Raised Below: T2) ...................... 6 POINT II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT … Below: T2) ........................................ 13 CONCLUSION …
-
A-3427-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Number: A-003427-23T2 Appellate Letter Brief TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT …………………………………………………8 … LEGAL ARGUMENT …………………………………………………………..12 POINT 1 ………………………………………………………………….12 THE TRIAL COURT ERRED … FORTH PALPABLY SUFFICIENT ALLEGATIONS TO SUPPORT A CLAIM POINT 2 …………………………………………………………………14 THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN …
-
A-1068-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Division, March 12, 2024, A-001068-23, AMENDED TABLE OF CONTENTS … History . 3 Statement of Facts . 4 Legal Argument 6 POINT ONE 6 THERE WAS NOT AN IMPROPER DENIAL OF ACCESS UNDER … INFORMATION WAS NOT MADE TO THE CUSTODIAN. (Da85; Da108) POINT TWO A CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS IS NOT REQUIRED TO …
njcourts.gov
… from a March 10, 2017 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). We affirm. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … petition. On this appeal, defendant presents the following points of argument: POINT I: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT REHM RECEIVED …
njcourts.gov
… from an August 5, 2016 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). Defendant argues he NOT FOR … oral opinion. We affirm. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR [PCR] SHOULD NOT BE BARRED … WERE NOT EXPRESSLY ADJUDICATED BY THE APPELLATE DIVISION. POINT II DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR [PCR] SHOULD NOT BE BARRED …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 8, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Lihotz and O'Connor. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law … oral argument. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I – THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … filed a self-represented PCR petition. Following the appointment of PCR counsel, a supporting brief was filed on … On appeal, defendant articulates her arguments as follows: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S …