default
… NJT maintains is a prerequisite to final agency actions or decisions pursuant to Frapaul Construction Co. v. … to the Appellate Division as of right . . . to review final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency or … the conclusions of the DOT Claims Committee are not final decisions within contemplation of [Rule] 2:2-3(a)(2). The …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3381-17T4 IN THE MATTER OF RICARDO MORA AND KELLI KENNY, WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1517-12-0005.1 WFD 160001, CHALLENGED BY JAMES BODENHEIMER. _______________________________ Argued …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
-
njcourts.gov
… fees imposed. Accordingly, we affirm both of the Board's decisions on appeal. I Before addressing the legal issues …
-
njcourts.gov
… NJT maintains is a prerequisite to final agency actions or decisions pursuant to Frapaul Construction Co. v. … to the Appellate Division as of right . . . to review final decisions or actions of any state administrative agency or … the conclusions of the DOT Claims Committee are not final decisions within contemplation of [Rule] 2:2-3(a)(2). The …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3381-17T4 IN THE MATTER OF RICARDO MORA AND KELLI KENNY, WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1517-12-0005.1 WFD 160001, CHALLENGED BY JAMES BODENHEIMER. _______________________________ Argued …
njcourts.gov
… the authority of administrators in respect of decisions regarding tenure. In an application of estoppel …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
… The State further contends the court erroneously relied on decisions and principles that have been rejected by our … vis-à-vis the right of confrontation. Those decisions find support in United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. … unlike the trial court, "we are not bound by our earlier decisions because we do not sit en banc." Liberty Mut. Ins. …
-
njcourts.gov
… the overall sufficiency and explanation of the final agency decisions. Because we agree with appellants that the scoring … gone unexplained, we intervene and vacate the final agency decisions in question, and we remand for further … on our disposition of these appeals about the final agency decisions rendered in December 2018. 7 A-2204-18T4 each in …
-
njcourts.gov
… the authority of administrators in respect of decisions regarding tenure. In an application of estoppel …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-0042-16T2 A-4339-16T1 A-4343-16T4 A-4797-16T3 K.G., Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. …
-
A-53-23 Supplemental Appellant Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… REVIEWABLE INFORMATION TO SUBSTANTIATE ITS ELIGIBILITY DECISIONS. (Psca8-9) … sufficient reasoning to substantiate its eligibility decisions. FILED, Clerk of the Supreme Court, 21 Aug 2024, … DETAILED REVIEWABLE INFORMATION TO EXPLAIN ELIGIBILITY DECISIONS. (Psca8-9) The CRA and relevant DOC regulations …
-
A-2328-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… acted arbitrarily or abused its discretion in rendering its decisions. In re AG Law Enf’t Directive Nos. 2020-5 & …
-
njcourts.gov
… The State further contends the court erroneously relied on decisions and principles that have been rejected by our … vis-à-vis the right of confrontation. Those decisions find support in United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. … unlike the trial court, "we are not bound by our earlier decisions because we do not sit en banc." Liberty Mut. Ins. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Chart A ‐ Warrants Initial Release Decisions for Criminal Justice Reform Eligible Defendants … Chart A ‐ Supplemental Graphs Initial Release Decisions for Criminal Justice Reform Eligible Defendants … January 1, 2022 ‐ November 30, 2022 Initial Release Decisions by Type of Decision (number of defendants) …
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
njcourts.gov
… States Supreme Court regarding each of this court's prior decisions. … JANET YIJUAN FOU VS. KEVIN KERVENG TUNG PC, ET …
njcourts.gov
… findings of fact and conclusion[s] of law supporting its decisions." Having considered defendant's arguments in light …