
Filters
- 7.12 Charges Document PDFnjcourts.gov… However, while the passenger ordinarily has no duty to control or direct the driver, there is a point where reliance upon the driver ends and the duty to … — Page 2 of 3 [Alternative: While a passenger who has no control over the car is not responsible for the negligence …
- njcourts.gov… WEYGANDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GETINGE US SALES, LLC, MANPOWER US INC., and NEVAR BOOKER, Defendants-Respondents. … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … informed the employees that "any absence would count as a point and more points would lead to disciplinary action, and …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JESSE SANTANA (13-11-3234, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT ONE: THE PCR JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHERE HE DID … THE ACTIONS OF THE ACCUSED LEADING TO THE 2012 ROBBERIES. POINT TWO: THE PROOF NEEDED TO ESTABLISH THE PREJUDICE PRONG …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … month term. Defendant raises the following issue on appeal: POINT I IT WAS PLAIN ERROR TO ALLOW THE INVESTIGATING … of defendant or knowledge of defendant at any particular point in time. Additionally, defendant contends there 8 …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LEWIS HOOPER (13-06-0768, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Burroughs, Designated counsel, on the briefs). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … pro se petition centered on those comments. A third judge appointed counsel for defendant, who filed a supplemental … hearing. PCR counsel also requested the court consider points defendant wished to raise. In addition to restating …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOHN DEROSA (10-06-1170, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO FILE AN … SERVICES. A. INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES. B. EXPERT WITNESSES. POINT II THE PCR COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING DEFENDANT AN …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … entered the home, two of whom had guns and one of whom was pointing a gun at G.T. The men demanded money from G.T. The … first PCR counsel failed to 7 A-0244-23 raise the first two points in the initial PCR petition; and finally, first PCR …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant presents the following issues in his appeal. POINT I THE PCR COURT WAS WRONG WHEN IT DENIED DEFENDANT'S … errors denied Defendant effective assistance of counsel. POINT II AS THERE WERE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACTS IN …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the following issues for our consideration in his appeal: POINT I THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT THE PETITIONER … 4 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 7 A-1549-17T4 POINT II BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF …
- K.P. VS. S.V.P. (FV-15-1553-18, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… not filed a brief. PER CURIAM 1 We use initials to preserve confidentiality in accordance with R. 1:38-3(d)(9) and … matter who started it, you can't escalate a fight to the point where both parties are getting injured. The judge concluded the "relationship has become toxic to the point that it looks like it's over and but for the fact that …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAVID L. GASKINS (09-06-0258, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … counsel." On appeal, defendant raises the following issue: POINT I DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … claim raised by defendant, no argument need be made on that point. Stated differently, the brief must advance the …
- J.A.M. VS. M.L.S. (FV-07-2336-18, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … website featured a photo of defendant holding a handgun and pointing it at the viewer. The rap song itself contained the … supported by a picture of defendant holding a gun and pointing it outward at the viewer. The judge concluded that …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … put and engaging with the officer who has exhibited such a pointed intention to interact with that person." Id. at … front of the DeVille or not, the officers communicated "a pointed intention to interact with" the people in the car by …
- J.H. VS. C.H. (FV-11-0193-19, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… filed a brief. PER CURIAM 1 We use initials to protect the confidentiality of the parties. R. 1:38-3(d)(9). NOT FOR … 3 A-1239-18T3 Plaintiff returned to his home. At some point that same day, defendant arrived with her son, who … when plaintiff arrived, and "there could have been another point during the day when she left and [the worker] wouldn't …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … officer. His membership in PFRS continued following his appointment that year as a police officer with the Milburn … Regular Session, 1998. 7 A-1361-17T1 Petitioners further point to an August 4, 2014 letter to the Director of …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JUAN POLANCO (16-02-0207, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE POST-CONVICTION RELIEF COURT ERRED IN DENYING …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DENISE R. FLAHERTY (18-8, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … license suspension on the refusal. 3 We have eliminated the point heading describing the standard of review and renumbered the remaining points accordingly. 4 A-0826-18T4 SUFFICIENTLY PROVIDES A …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … now, given our court schedule, only to find out at some point along the way, after much time and expense, that, in … application. We agree with the State. Initially, we point out that effective July 1, 2018, the Guidelines were …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. STEVEN PARKEY (11-03-0354, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … as to each factor. This appeal followed. 9 A-0752-18T1 POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING DEFENDANT AN … TO ARGUE THE RELEVANT APPLICABLE LAW AT THE SANDS HEARING. POINT II THE COURT ERRED IN NOT ALLOWING DEFENDANT TO …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LAMONT LOPER (17-10-2153, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE EVIDENCE MUST BE SUPPRESSED BECAUSE THE SEARCH WAS THE PRODUCT OF AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DETENTION. POINT II: THE SENTENCE VIOLATES THE INJUNCTION AGAINST …