
Filters
- J.A.M. VS. M.L.S. (FV-07-2336-18, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … website featured a photo of defendant holding a handgun and pointing it at the viewer. The rap song itself contained the … supported by a picture of defendant holding a gun and pointing it outward at the viewer. The judge concluded that …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … put and engaging with the officer who has exhibited such a pointed intention to interact with that person." Id. at … front of the DeVille or not, the officers communicated "a pointed intention to interact with" the people in the car by …
- J.H. VS. C.H. (FV-11-0193-19, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… filed a brief. PER CURIAM 1 We use initials to protect the confidentiality of the parties. R. 1:38-3(d)(9). NOT FOR … 3 A-1239-18T3 Plaintiff returned to his home. At some point that same day, defendant arrived with her son, who … when plaintiff arrived, and "there could have been another point during the day when she left and [the worker] wouldn't …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … officer. His membership in PFRS continued following his appointment that year as a police officer with the Milburn … Regular Session, 1998. 7 A-1361-17T1 Petitioners further point to an August 4, 2014 letter to the Director of …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JUAN POLANCO (16-02-0207, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE POST-CONVICTION RELIEF COURT ERRED IN DENYING …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DENISE R. FLAHERTY (18-8, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … license suspension on the refusal. 3 We have eliminated the point heading describing the standard of review and renumbered the remaining points accordingly. 4 A-0826-18T4 SUFFICIENTLY PROVIDES A …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … now, given our court schedule, only to find out at some point along the way, after much time and expense, that, in … application. We agree with the State. Initially, we point out that effective July 1, 2018, the Guidelines were …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. STEVEN PARKEY (11-03-0354, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … as to each factor. This appeal followed. 9 A-0752-18T1 POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING DEFENDANT AN … TO ARGUE THE RELEVANT APPLICABLE LAW AT THE SANDS HEARING. POINT II THE COURT ERRED IN NOT ALLOWING DEFENDANT TO …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LAMONT LOPER (17-10-2153, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE EVIDENCE MUST BE SUPPRESSED BECAUSE THE SEARCH WAS THE PRODUCT OF AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DETENTION. POINT II: THE SENTENCE VIOLATES THE INJUNCTION AGAINST …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … petition. This appeal followed. On appeal defendant argues: POINT I: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S PETITION … Padilla, 559 U.S. at 369. However, a counsel's "failure to point out to a noncitizen client that he or she is pleading …
- ANTOINETTE TUTTOILMONDO VS. HUNGMO LIN (L-7154-16, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … motion is denied. On appeal, plaintiff raises these issues: POINT I THE FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE BURDEN OF PROOF ON THE … SHEET RESULTED IN A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW. POINT II A DE NOVO REVIEW OF THE TRIAL JUDGE'S DECISION IS …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … contend the font used in the arbitration provisions is "9-point arial." Defendants note the entire agreement uses the … final hearing. 7 A-4448-19 On appeal, plaintiffs raise four points for our consideration. Procedurally, plaintiffs …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KEVIN L. DILKS (18-05-0161, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant argues the following point: 2 State v. Slater, 198 N.J. 145, 157-58 (2009). 6 A-2351-19 POINT I COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT WAS INEFFECTIVE AS HE FAILED …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BLONSON FLORESTAL (15-04-0466, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … he had given to detectives. On appeal, he argues: POINT I [DEFENDANT'S] STATEMENT WAS IMPROPERLY RULED … THE FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT OF CONTINUED INTERROGATION. POINT II [DEFENDANT'S] SENTENCE IS EXCESSIVE AND MUST BE …
- SABRINA PAGAN, ET AL. VS. EDUARDO RIVERA (L-4810-19, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: I. THE LAW DIVISION ABUSED ITS … we do not reach the issues raised by defendants in Points I through III. The order granting leave to file a …
- njcourts.gov… LESTER SLABY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHEAST CONSTRUCTION, LLC, d/b/a NORTHEAST CONSTRUCTION & … I9 to this address. The car wash address is 600 Ocean Ave, Point Pleasant, NJ." After plaintiff began applying the … McBarron, 365 N.J. Super. at 116-17 ("Plaintiffs correctly point out that the mere anticipation of a written …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HOWARD W. RAMBO (18-01-0013, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the following arguments for this court's consideration1: POINT I THE PCR [JUDGE] ERRED WHEN [HE] FAILED TO GRANT … State v. Preciose, 129 N.J. 451, 460 (1992))). 3 A-3068-19 POINT II SENTENCING COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE AND …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … as to what time [he] showed up at the scene." At that point, the court interjected and asked if there was "any … of cross-examination, he did not seek a continuance at that point to pursue further discovery based on A.G.-B.'s use of …
- njcourts.gov… in some parts of the record and "Garett" in others. For consistency, we use the name as "Garett" because it appears … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE LOWER COURT'S DECISION MUST BE VACATED SINCE IT … STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ACTIONS. POINT II THE PLAINTIFF SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIED WITH THE [AOM …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE MOTION JUDGE ERRED BY FAILING TO GIVE EFFECT TO … PROVISION THAT COULD ISSUE ONLY DURING THE AT-WILL PERIOD POINT II THE MOTION JUDGE ERRED BY FAILING TO CONSIDER THE …