njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the following three arguments for our consideration: POINT I – THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN FINDING BEYOND A … WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT INDEPENDENT PROOF POINT II – THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN ACCEPTING THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … construe the stipulation in context as plaintiffs "[a]t no point . . . contemplated [they] would voluntarily give up … grace period would be reasonable. 6 A-2561-22 end point, and from there the [sixty]-day period would begin to …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S SECOND … AND THE MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. POINT II PETITIONER HAS ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in a later PCR proceeding. 3 A-0322-22 The trial court appointed defendant's former public defender as standby … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT 1: STANDBY COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT TIMELY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the trial," Spence "never approached" trial counsel "at any point before or during the trial." Further, the judge … II. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE AND PURSUE AN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant was simply sitting in his car drinking to the point of passing out if they do not comport with common … raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO GRANT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … August 11, 2022. On appeal, Hartford makes two arguments: POINT I THE JUDGE'S ORDERS ON MAY 7, 2019 VIOLATED … THE [HARTFORD] DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. (Not raised below) POINT II THE PETITIONER WAS NOT IN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the court concluded that an evidentiary hearing on this point was not warranted. On August 17, 2017, the court … appeal followed. Defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN PROCEEDING WITH ORAL …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … remand to decide the matter on the merits. 6 A-2252-17T3 POINT I AS THE PCR COURT MISAPPREHENDED PETITIONER'S CLAIM, THAT MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR A NEW HEARING. POINT II AS THERE ARE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACTS IN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, along the nineteen access points. In December 2012, the Borough Council presented its … rather, the beach can only be accessed at select access points that have stairs and ramps for patrons to use to walk …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … his convictions and sentence. He presents the following points of argument: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED MR. PEREZ’S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, appellant raises the following issues: POINT 1: THE DECISION TO CHARACTERIZE NGOMBE WAJAGGA'S … N.J. Court Rules, cmt. 5 on R. 2:6-2 (2019). 5 A-5738-17T4 POINT 2: THE ADMINISTRATOR'S FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE MERITS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the denial of both motions, raising the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE GRAND JURY PRESENTATION FOR THIS ONE[-]COUNT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … makes the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I APPELLANT SHOULD NOT BE PROCEDURALLY BARRED FROM … AGAINST PCR COUNSEL: [SIC] NOT AGAINST TRIAL COUNSEL. POINT II PETITIONER RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF PCR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … defendant presents three arguments for our consideration: POINT I – DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN TIME-BARRED. POINT II – THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of the evidence.2 On appeal, appellant raises two points: POINT I: APPELLANT WAS DENIED RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed, with defendant raising the following points of argument: POINT I IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, [DEFENDANT'S] PCR CLAIM …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT … DEFENDANT WAS GUILTY OF A VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 39:4- 97.3. POINT II THE POLICE OFFICER LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE TO STOP [] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … judgment of conviction, raising the following single point for our consideration: BECAUSE THE COURT ERRED IN … 157 N.J. 463, 470 (1999))). In support, Judge Rodriguez pointed to the fact that defendant was "traveling at a high …